H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Naoko Sato vs Kate Latham H2H: 1-0

Naoko Sato holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naoko Sato leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Naoko Sato won the 1981 Roland Garros round of 128 6-7 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naoko Sato
JPN Age 71
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naoko Sato 6-7 7-5 7-5 Kate Latham Match data May 27, 1981* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naoko Sato — — — 1,628 56 91 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naoko Sato Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1972 2–3 40.0% — 1,504 0 0 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1973 4–6 40.0% — 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1974 7–16 30.4% — 1,452 0 0 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1975 5–7 41.7% — 1,492 0 0 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1976 4–8 33.3% — 1,530 0 0 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1977 8–12 40.0% — 1,566 0 0 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1978 6–7 46.2% — 1,594 0 0 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1979 8–9 47.1% — 1,594 0 0 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 1980 11–10 52.4% — 1,592 0 0 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 1981 1–6 14.3% — 1,531 0 0 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,520 0 0 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 1983 0–4 0.0% — 1,467 0 0 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,458 0 0 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 1987 0–1 0.0% — 1,451 0 0 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naoko Sato Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1973 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1974 2 2 4 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1975 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1976 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1978 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1980 1 1 2 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 1984 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 1987 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 3 11 14 21.4% 13 27 40 32.5% 27 40 67 40.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naoko Sato Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 1972 1505 88.1 — — — — +47 — — 36.4% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.31 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1973 1496 92.8 — — — — — -8 +52 40.9% -1.41 1–1 — — +1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1974 1453 91.0 — — — — +95 -59 +77 34.0% -1.11 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 +1.33 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 1975 1493 95.6 — — — — — -27 — 40.7% -1.33 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.98 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1976 1530 116.3 — — — — — -82 +48 28.0% -1.64 2–1 (67%) — — -0.39 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 1977 1567 121.7 — — — — — -112 +16 43.8% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 101.1 +1.63 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 1978 1595 111.7 — — — — — -138 +17 48.3% -0.17 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.54 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 1979 1594 114.4 — — — — — — +13 47.4% +0.05 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.58 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 1980 1593 108.7 — — — — — -117 -11 53.2% +0.30 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +1.74 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 1981 1531 97.3 — — — — -43 -32 — 23.5% -1.88 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.51 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 1982 1520 99.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.01 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 1983 1467 93.8 — — — — — — — 11.1% -1.89 0–1 — — +0.48 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 1984 1459 102.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.02 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 1987 1451 91.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.06 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 1629 106.1 — — — — +45 -69 +25 39.8% -0.84 18–22 (45%) 10–10 (50%) 101.4 +6.65 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.