H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Naoko Sato vs Liz Smylie H2H: 0-1
Liz Smylie holds a 1–0 lead over Naoko Sato in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Liz Smylie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1982 Beckenham second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 1982* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Liz Smylie | 6-4 7-5 | Naoko Sato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naoko Sato | — | — | — | 1,637 | 58 | 91 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naoko Sato | Liz Smylie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1973 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1974 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1976 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1977 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1978 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1979 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1980 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1981 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |