H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Naoko Sato vs Yukie Koizumi H2H: 1-0
Naoko Sato holds a 1–0 lead over Yukie Koizumi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naoko Sato leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naoko Sato won the 1980 Tokyo Japan Open third round 2-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1980* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Naoko Sato | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Yukie Koizumi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naoko Sato | — | — | — | 1,637 | 58 | 91 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yukie Koizumi | — | — | — | 1,503 | 10 | 22 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naoko Sato | Yukie Koizumi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1973 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1974 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1976 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1977 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1978 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1979 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1980 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1981 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |