H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Naoko Sawamatsu vs Laura Garrone H2H: 1-0
Naoko Sawamatsu holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Garrone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naoko Sawamatsu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Naoko Sawamatsu won the 1994 Roland Garros first round 4-6 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 53
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1994* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Naoko Sawamatsu | 4-6 6-4 6-0 | Laura Garrone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naoko Sawamatsu | #266 | #14 | 881 | 1,971 | 182 | 127 | 58.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Laura Garrone | #262 | #32 | 90 | 1,726 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naoko Sawamatsu | Laura Garrone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1990 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #31 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #28 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #156 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #55 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #167 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |