H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Naoko Sawamatsu vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 2-0
Naoko Sawamatsu holds a 2–0 lead over Stephanie Rehe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Naoko Sawamatsu leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naoko Sawamatsu won the 1992 Key Biscayne second round 6-2 6-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 53
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1992* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Naoko Sawamatsu | 6-2 6-7 6-1 | Stephanie Rehe | Match data |
| Feb 7, 1992* | Osaka | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Naoko Sawamatsu | 1-6 7-5 6-1 | Stephanie Rehe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naoko Sawamatsu | #266 | #14 | 881 | 1,971 | 182 | 127 | 58.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Stephanie Rehe | #156 | #10 | 60 | 2,000 | 134 | 98 | 57.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naoko Sawamatsu | Stephanie Rehe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #182 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #19 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1990 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #31 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 17–8 | 68.0% | #28 | 1,868 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1991 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1992 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #28 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,968 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1994 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #123 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1995 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #74 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1996 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #55 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |