H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Natalia Egorova vs Helen Kelesi H2H: 1-1
Natalia Egorova and Helen Kelesi are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natalia Egorova leads 1–0 on clay, while Helen Kelesi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Helen Kelesi won the 1987 US Open first round 7-6(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 59
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1987* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Helen Kelesi | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Natalia Egorova | Match data |
| May 6, 1987* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Natalia Egorova | 6-7 7-6 6-4 | Helen Kelesi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Egorova | #1,218 | #76 | 55 | 1,623 | 17 | 28 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Helen Kelesi | #755 | #13 | 54 | 1,958 | 213 | 164 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natalia Egorova | Helen Kelesi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1987 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #25 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #82 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #29 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #48 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #436 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #469 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |