Natalia Egorova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Svetlana Cherneva | 1 | 1 | 2 | Oct 27, 1988 | H2H |
| Barbara Potter | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 24, 1988 | H2H |
| Eva Krapl | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jun 22, 1988 | H2H |
| Leila Meskhi | 0 | 2 | 2 | Apr 23, 1988 | H2H |
| Helen Kelesi | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 3, 1987 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek holds a 1–0 lead over Natalia Egorova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Lou Piatek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1987 Chicago round of 32 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | 6-3 6-3 | Natalia Egorova | Match data | Nov 12, 1987* | R32 | Chicago | WTA 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Egorova | #1,218 | #76 | 55 | 1,623 | 17 | 28 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,931 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Natalia Egorova | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #82 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #436 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #469 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,869 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Natalia Egorova | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1987 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1978 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1988 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 1993 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1980 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 1996 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | Career | 75 | 85 | 160 | 46.9% | 17 | 32 | 49 | 34.7% | 12 | 29 | 41 | 29.3% | 49 | 60 | 109 | 45.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Natalia Egorova | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1987 | 1530 | 113.9 | — | — | — | — | +43 | +11 | +11 | 38.8% | -0.57 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–4 (43%) | 102.0 | +0.04 | 1978 | 1499 | 106.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.12 |
| 1988 | 1569 | 117.3 | — | — | — | — | +27 | — | -44 | 41.5% | -0.76 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–0 | — | +0.42 | 1979 | 1547 | 118.2 | — | — | — | — | +97 | — | — | 42.1% | -0.89 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.14 |
| 1993 | 1548 | 96.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.21 | 1980 | 1735 | 137.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -158 | — | 55.7% | +0.51 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–0 | — | -0.18 |
| 1996 | 1537 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 | 1981 | 1869 | 146.1 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -192 | -295 | 56.7% | +0.48 | 8–10 (44%) | 6–5 (55%) | 101.1 | -3.04 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1792 | 141.6 | — | — | — | — | +56 | -194 | -210 | 47.1% | -0.08 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.7 | -0.75 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1721 | 143.7 | — | — | — | — | +53 | -86 | — | 41.3% | -0.43 | 4–7 (36%) | 0–5 (0%) | 91.3 | -3.81 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1703 | 128.4 | — | — | — | — | -13 | — | -69 | 47.7% | -0.47 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–3 (57%) | 101.0 | -0.69 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1678 | 113.6 | — | — | — | — | -29 | -65 | -67 | 43.1% | -0.61 | 5–3 (63%) | 1–3 (25%) | 100.7 | +2.10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1618 | 111.0 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | -24 | 38.5% | -0.67 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | 95.5 | +1.60 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1594 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | — | 35.7% | -0.78 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–1 | — | +0.29 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1542 | 116.2 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -43 | — | 30.8% | -1.31 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–2 | — | -0.55 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1592 | 121.3 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -116 | — | 31.4% | -1.65 | 5–2 (71%) | 4–2 (67%) | 107.3 | -2.88 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1611 | 125.3 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -85 | — | 43.9% | -0.63 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.44 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1630 | 119.4 | — | — | — | — | +17 | — | — | 41.4% | -0.31 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.69 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1560 | 101.4 | — | — | — | — | -16 | — | — | 23.8% | -2.00 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–2 | — | -0.39 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1555 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | -22 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.71 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.16 |
| Career | 1624 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | +33 | +11 | -13 | 38.7% | -0.77 | 9–7 (56%) | 5–4 (56%) | 105.3 | +1.29 | Career | 1932 | 136.4 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -124 | -154 | 43.9% | -0.44 | 46–55 (46%) | 19–34 (36%) | 92.3 | -2.67 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Svetlana Cherneva | 1 | 1 | 2 | Oct 27, 1988 | H2H |
| Barbara Potter | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 24, 1988 | H2H |
| Eva Krapl | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jun 22, 1988 | H2H |
| Leila Meskhi | 0 | 2 | 2 | Apr 23, 1988 | H2H |
| Helen Kelesi | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 3, 1987 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | 5 | 5 | 10 | Mar 31, 1990 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 8 | 1 | 9 | Sep 26, 1986 | H2H |
| Anne Smith | 1 | 7 | 8 | Feb 14, 1991 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 8 | 8 | Dec 2, 1984 | H2H |
| Wendy White | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 22, 1990 | H2H |