H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Natalia Medvedeva vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 0-1
Bettina Fulco holds a 1–0 lead over Natalia Medvedeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bettina Fulco leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bettina Fulco won the 1996 Maria Lankowitz third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1996* | Maria Lankowitz | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Bettina Fulco | 6-4 6-1 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Medvedeva | #387 | #23 | 295 | 1,881 | 111 | 111 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natalia Medvedeva | Bettina Fulco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,694 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #388 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |