H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Natalia Medvedeva vs Eugenia Maniokova H2H: 1-1
Natalia Medvedeva and Eugenia Maniokova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natalia Medvedeva leads 1–0 on carpet, while Eugenia Maniokova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eugenia Maniokova won the 1992 San Antonio fourth round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 58
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 1992* | San Antonio | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Eugenia Maniokova | 7-6 6-4 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
| Feb 15, 1992* | Linz | WTA 500 | SF | Carpet | Natalia Medvedeva | 6-3 6-2 | Eugenia Maniokova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Medvedeva | #387 | #23 | 295 | 1,881 | 111 | 111 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Eugenia Maniokova | #579 | #66 | 18 | 1,587 | 22 | 48 | 31.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natalia Medvedeva | Eugenia Maniokova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1994 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,694 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #107 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #87 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #388 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #163 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #116 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #166 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |