H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Natalia Medvedeva vs Natalia Baudone H2H: 1-1
Natalia Medvedeva and Natalia Baudone are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natalia Baudone leads 1–0 on clay, while Natalia Medvedeva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natalia Medvedeva won the 1995 Key Biscayne first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1995* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Natalia Medvedeva | 6-4 6-2 | Natalia Baudone | Match data |
| Apr 29, 1993* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Natalia Baudone | 6-1 3-6 7-5 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Medvedeva | #387 | #23 | 295 | 1,881 | 111 | 111 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Natalia Baudone | #934 | #71 | 126 | 1,682 | 38 | 58 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Natalia Medvedeva | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #101 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #96 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,694 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #388 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |