H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Natalia Medvedeva vs Patricia Tarabini H2H: 2-1
Natalia Medvedeva holds a 2–1 lead over Patricia Tarabini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Natalia Medvedeva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natalia Medvedeva won the 1993 Prague semifinal 6-7 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 1993* | Prague | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Natalia Medvedeva | 6-7 6-4 7-5 | Patricia Tarabini | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1993* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Patricia Tarabini | 6-3 7-5 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1992* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Natalia Medvedeva | 6-2 6-0 | Patricia Tarabini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Medvedeva | #387 | #23 | 295 | 1,881 | 111 | 111 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Patricia Tarabini | #617 | #29 | 29 | 1,743 | 104 | 122 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natalia Medvedeva | Patricia Tarabini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #108 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #65 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #36 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #60 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,694 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #126 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #388 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #104 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |