H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Natalia Medvedeva vs Sabine Hack H2H: 2-2
Natalia Medvedeva and Sabine Hack are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Natalia Medvedeva leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sabine Hack won the 1995 Palermo semifinal 4-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 1995* | Palermo | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Sabine Hack | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1993* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Natalia Medvedeva | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Sabine Hack | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1991* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Sabine Hack | 6-4 7-6 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
| Oct 14, 1989* | Moscow | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Natalia Medvedeva | 6-4 6-4 | Sabine Hack | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Medvedeva | #387 | #23 | 295 | 1,881 | 111 | 111 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Sabine Hack | #523 | #13 | 577 | 1,996 | 180 | 135 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natalia Medvedeva | Sabine Hack | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #262 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1989 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #146 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #45 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1994 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,694 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #388 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #40 | 1,729 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #523 | 1,648 | 0 | 5 |