H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Natalia Medvedeva vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 1-0
Natalia Medvedeva holds a 1–0 lead over Tami Whitlinger Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Natalia Medvedeva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natalia Medvedeva won the 1991 Boca Raton second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 1991* | Boca Raton | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Natalia Medvedeva | 6-3 7-5 | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Medvedeva | #387 | #23 | 295 | 1,881 | 111 | 111 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | — | — | — | 1,786 | 106 | 135 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natalia Medvedeva | Tami Whitlinger Jones | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,694 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #388 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |