H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Natasha Chmyreva vs Renata Tomanova H2H: 2-2

Natasha Chmyreva and Renata Tomanova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Natasha Chmyreva leads 2–1 on clay, while Renata Tomanova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Natasha Chmyreva won the 1976 US Open round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Chmyreva
URS Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Renata Tomanova
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Natasha Chmyreva 6-2 6-3 Renata Tomanova Match data Sep 7, 1976* R32 US Open Grand Slam Clay
Natasha Chmyreva 6-3 7-5 Renata Tomanova Match data Aug 7, 1976* SF Prerov WTA 250 Clay
Renata Tomanova 6-4 6-3 Natasha Chmyreva Match data May 24, 1973* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Renata Tomanova 6-4 6-2 Natasha Chmyreva Match data Mar 1, 1973* R32 Moscow Intl WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Natasha Chmyreva — — — 1,980 58 39 59.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,948 225 213 51.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Chmyreva Renata Tomanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,465 0 0 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0
16 1974 5–3 62.5% — 1,542 0 1 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0
17 1975 26–13 66.7% — 1,822 0 2 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
18 1976 18–13 58.1% — 1,929 0 2 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0
19 1977 7–5 58.3% — 1,964 0 2 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4
20 1978 1–0 100.0% — 1,969 0 3 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6
21 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,948 0 3 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,848 0 8
22 — — — — — — — 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,860 0 9
23 — — — — — — — 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,761 0 9
24 — — — — — — — 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,692 0 9
25 — — — — — — — 1980 24–23 51.1% — 1,680 0 9
26 — — — — — — — 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,681 0 9
27 — — — — — — — 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,692 0 9
28 — — — — — — — 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,597 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,533 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Natasha Chmyreva Renata Tomanova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1972 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
16 1974 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
19 1977 — — — — — — — — — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1978 — — — — 1 0 1 100.0% — — — — — — — — 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
21 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 2 2 4 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 20 9 29 69.0% 17 19 36 47.2% — 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 22 47 69 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Natasha Chmyreva Renata Tomanova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1972 1486 87.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1973 1466 97.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.13 — — — +0.65 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89
16 1974 1543 124.3 — — — — — -6 — 62.5% +0.94 — — — +0.70 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64
17 1975 1823 146.4 — — — — -163 -222 -54 61.1% +0.82 11–6 (65%) 3–2 (60%) 109.4 -0.71 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01
18 1976 1930 157.0 — — — — -127 -216 -114 59.4% +0.62 4–5 (44%) 0–1 — -3.53 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.54
19 1977 1965 136.8 — — — — -81 — — 60.0% +0.60 2–0 3–2 (60%) — -1.50 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +1.96
20 1978 1970 102.5 — — — — — — — 66.7% -0.33 1–0 — — +0.07 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +119 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.83
21 1979 1949 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.09 1976 1849 141.0 — — — — -235 +74 -173 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.94
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1861 152.7 — — — — -166 +102 -183 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.43
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1761 130.1 — — — — -89 +113 +14 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.3 +1.25
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1692 132.4 — — — — -98 +239 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.72
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1681 127.8 — — — — -128 +207 +28 51.9% +0.19 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 97.4 +0.01
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1682 123.3 — — — — -26 +171 -14 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.3 +0.42
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1693 123.3 — — — — -75 +88 -13 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.67
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +87 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — -0.02
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1581 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1570 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1533 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.38
Career — 1981 148.9 — — — — -121 -173 -76 58.1% +0.53 18–11 (62%) 6–5 (55%) 111.4 -4.39 — 1948 138.0 — — — — -122 +120 -54 50.6% +0.03 70–57 (55%) 31–33 (48%) 101.2 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.