H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Natasha Chmyreva vs Wendy Overton H2H: 1-0
Natasha Chmyreva holds a 1–0 lead over Wendy Overton in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Natasha Chmyreva leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Natasha Chmyreva won the 1976 Dallas fourth round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 1976* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Natasha Chmyreva | 6-2 7-5 | Wendy Overton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natasha Chmyreva | — | — | — | 1,950 | 58 | 40 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Wendy Overton | — | — | — | 1,920 | 123 | 142 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natasha Chmyreva | Wendy Overton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1974 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1975 | 26–13 | 66.7% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1976 | 18–13 | 58.1% | — | 1,923 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1977 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,945 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1978 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,929 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 40–30 | 57.1% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 14–23 | 37.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |