H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 1-1

Natasha Zvereva and Andrea Temesvari are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on clay, while Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1993 Italian Open round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Andrea Temesvari
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Natasha Zvereva #22 6-2 6-2 Andrea Temesvari #81 Match data May 6, 1993* R32 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Andrea Temesvari #143 1-6 7-6 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #27 Match data Jun 12, 1992* R16 Birmingham Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Natasha Zvereva — #5 1,820 2,074 393 236 62.5% 0 0 0 2 2 4
Andrea Temesvari — #7 109 2,022 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Andrea Temesvari
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,836 0 0 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,771 0 1
17 1988 40–18 69.0% #7 1,997 0 0 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,990 0 4
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,805 0 0 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,953 0 2 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,849 0 5
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,802 0 5
21 1992 34–20 63.0% #23 1,981 0 2 1987 1–2 33.3% — 1,776 0 5
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,973 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,979 0 3 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,612 0 5
25 1996 13–13 50.0% #57 1,897 0 3 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,907 0 3 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5
27 1998 34–21 61.8% #16 1,927 0 3 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,823 0 4 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5
29 2000 11–13 45.8% #78 1,732 0 4 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,707 0 4 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,529 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Natasha Zvereva Andrea Temesvari
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
16 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
17 1988 16 10 26 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1989 12 6 18 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
19 1990 15 3 18 83.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1991 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 15 6 21 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1997 15 10 25 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1998 15 10 25 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 157 98 255 61.6% 98 56 154 63.6% 70 31 101 69.3% 68 51 119 57.1% — 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Natasha Zvereva Andrea Temesvari
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1575 112.5 — — — — +64 — — 56.3% -0.12 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — +0.80 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — -0.16
16 1987 1836 140.6 — — — — -22 -248 -181 63.8% +0.70 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.1 +0.28 1982 1772 146.5 — — — — -152 -31 -162 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -3.02
17 1988 1998 161.3 — — — — -75 -214 -184 66.7% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 -2.80 1983 1990 163.1 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.39
18 1989 1805 144.2 — — — — +20 -25 -21 57.3% +0.91 4–5 (44%) 2–7 (22%) 91.9 +1.24 1984 1890 136.6 — — — — -79 +109 -174 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.4 +3.45
19 1990 1954 156.9 — — — — -79 -42 -37 65.8% +1.03 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.3 -0.92 1985 1849 136.5 — — — — -48 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.7 +1.41
20 1991 1912 148.9 — — — — -65 +41 +34 59.2% +0.55 6–3 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 106.2 -0.24 1986 1802 139.5 — — — — -39 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -0.74
21 1992 1982 158.4 — — — — -114 +58 +52 61.3% +0.90 6–5 (55%) 8–6 (57%) 102.4 -2.82 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -39 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17
22 1993 1974 157.3 — — — — -22 -9 +89 65.3% +0.98 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 1979 161.7 — — — — +7 -6 +1 69.6% +1.40 6–6 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 101.8 -1.08 1989 1751 135.3 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.31
24 1995 1971 161.0 — — — — +27 -3 +16 59.5% +0.80 13–7 (65%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 -0.19 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +9 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21
25 1996 1898 147.8 — — — — +44 +38 +90 50.0% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 -1.77 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26
26 1997 1908 154.8 — — — — +10 +4 +80 56.3% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -3.07 1992 1608 122.1 — — — — -5 +81 +64 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.26
27 1998 1928 157.5 — — — — -30 -3 +182 60.3% +0.46 6–5 (55%) 4–4 (50%) 98.9 -2.91 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +32 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66
28 1999 1823 141.3 — — — — +4 +2 +266 54.8% +0.40 8–3 (73%) 3–7 (30%) 99.9 -0.71 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25
29 2000 1733 128.2 — — — — +39 +59 +386 42.0% -0.66 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -0.52 1995 1486 104.7 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42
31 2002 1708 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29
Career — 2074 160.8 — — — — -23 -14 +52 60.5% +0.69 96–63 (60%) 77–61 (56%) 107.8 -2.24 — 2022 143.4 — — — — -57 +117 -111 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.