H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Ann Grossman H2H: 5-3

Natasha Zvereva holds a 5–3 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 3–2 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1995 US Open third round 6-4 7-6.

BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 3, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Natasha Zvereva #11 6-4 7-6 Ann Grossman #80 Match data
Nov 12, 1993* Philadelphia WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Natasha Zvereva #19 6-4 6-0 Ann Grossman #36 Match data
May 13, 1993* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Ann Grossman #38 7-5 6-0 Natasha Zvereva #21 Match data
May 6, 1992* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Natasha Zvereva #30 6-1 4-6 6-2 Ann Grossman #50 Match data
May 30, 1991* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Ann Grossman #63 4-6 6-1 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #16 Match data
May 17, 1990* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Natasha Zvereva #13 4-6 6-3 6-2 Ann Grossman #69 Match data
Apr 12, 1990* Amelia Island WTA 250 R32 Clay Natasha Zvereva #18 6-2 6-2 Ann Grossman #81 Match data
Nov 11, 1988* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Ann Grossman #53 6-3 6-3 Natasha Zvereva #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,888 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,749 0 0
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,636 0 0
21 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,734 0 0
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,810 0 0
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,664 0 0
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5
29 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5
31 2002 0–1 0.0% 1,733 0 5