H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Ann Grossman H2H: 5-3

Natasha Zvereva holds a 5–3 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 3–2 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1995 US Open round of 32 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 – 3
8 main-draw meetings
Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Natasha Zvereva #11 6-4 7-6 Ann Grossman #80 Match data Sep 3, 1995* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Natasha Zvereva #19 6-4 6-0 Ann Grossman #36 Match data Nov 12, 1993* R16 Philadelphia Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Ann Grossman #38 7-5 6-0 Natasha Zvereva #21 Match data May 13, 1993* R32 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Natasha Zvereva #30 6-1 4-6 6-2 Ann Grossman #50 Match data May 6, 1992* R64 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Ann Grossman #63 4-6 6-1 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #16 Match data May 30, 1991* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Natasha Zvereva #13 4-6 6-3 6-2 Ann Grossman #69 Match data May 17, 1990* R32 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Natasha Zvereva #18 6-2 6-2 Ann Grossman #81 Match data Apr 12, 1990* R32 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Ann Grossman #53 6-3 6-3 Natasha Zvereva #6 Match data Nov 11, 1988* R16 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,074 394 236 62.5% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,887 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,835 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1988 40–18 69.0% #7 1,997 0 0 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,804 0 0 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,953 0 2 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,748 0 0
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,638 0 0
21 1992 34–20 63.0% #23 1,981 0 2 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,733 0 0
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,973 0 2 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,804 0 0
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,979 0 3 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,970 0 3 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 1996 13–13 50.0% #57 1,897 0 3 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,665 0 0
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,907 0 3 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,934 0 4 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 2000 11–13 45.8% #78 1,733 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,708 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Natasha Zvereva Ann Grossman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 16 10 26 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1988 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1989 12 6 18 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 16 11 27 59.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1990 15 3 18 83.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1991 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1992 15 8 23 65.2% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1993 15 6 21 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1994 16 10 26 61.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1995 5 10 15 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1997 15 10 25 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1997 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1998 15 10 25 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 157 98 255 61.6% 98 56 154 63.6% 71 31 102 69.6% 68 51 119 57.1% — 111 106 217 51.2% 59 56 115 51.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 11 14 25 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Natasha Zvereva Ann Grossman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1575 112.4 — — — — +63 — — 56.3% -0.12 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 1836 140.5 — — — — -21 -249 -181 63.8% +0.70 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.1 +0.51 1987 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
17 1988 1997 161.2 — — — — -75 -213 -183 66.7% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 -3.11 1988 1699 133.9 — — — — +28 — — 54.1% +0.13 4–3 (57%) 0–5 (0%) 100.1 +0.16
18 1989 1805 144.1 — — — — +20 -25 -21 57.3% +0.91 4–5 (44%) 2–7 (22%) 91.9 -0.26 1989 1737 136.2 — — — — +43 -89 — 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -1.22
19 1990 1953 156.8 — — — — -78 -41 -36 65.8% +1.03 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.3 -0.92 1990 1749 136.3 — — — — -12 +8 — 51.0% +0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.48
20 1991 1912 148.8 — — — — -66 +41 +34 59.2% +0.55 6–3 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 106.2 -0.24 1991 1638 126.7 — — — — -16 +89 — 44.3% +0.06 3–7 (30%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.49
21 1992 1982 158.3 — — — — -114 +58 +53 61.3% +0.90 6–5 (55%) 8–6 (57%) 102.4 -2.82 1992 1733 132.9 — — — — +24 -9 — 52.9% -0.03 6–3 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 108.7 +1.73
22 1993 1974 157.3 — — — — -22 -9 +90 65.3% +0.98 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +0.50 1993 1805 140.5 — — — — +9 -60 — 59.6% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 +0.77
23 1994 1979 161.7 — — — — +7 -6 +1 69.6% +1.40 6–6 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 101.8 -1.08 1994 1853 146.2 — — — — 0 -73 -249 53.6% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.02
24 1995 1971 161.0 — — — — +27 -3 +16 59.5% +0.80 13–7 (65%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 -0.19 1995 1681 123.7 — — — — +38 +44 — 40.8% -0.46 4–5 (44%) 3–9 (25%) 92.7 +0.33
25 1996 1897 147.8 — — — — +45 +39 +91 50.0% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 -1.77 1996 1666 130.2 — — — — +49 +8 — 42.9% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.99
26 1997 1907 154.8 — — — — +11 +5 +82 56.3% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -3.07 1997 1615 123.7 — — — — +26 +98 — 38.6% -1.25 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.41
27 1998 1934 156.7 — — — — -36 -9 +187 60.5% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 99.6 -3.30 1998 1595 103.2 — — — — +41 +76 — 33.3% -1.58 — 1–0 — +0.11
28 1999 1825 141.3 — — — — +2 0 +268 54.8% +0.40 8–3 (73%) 3–7 (30%) 99.9 -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1733 128.2 — — — — +39 +59 +392 42.0% -0.66 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1708 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2074 160.7 — — — — -23 -15 +55 60.5% +0.69 97–63 (61%) 77–61 (56%) 107.9 -2.55 — 1888 140.3 — — — — +18 +6 -249 49.9% -0.10 53–53 (50%) 31–39 (44%) 99.5 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.