H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 3-0

Natasha Zvereva holds a 3–0 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1994 Indian Wells third round 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 24, 1994* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Natasha Zvereva #15 6-0 6-1 Betsy Nagelsen #394 Match data
Jun 21, 1990* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Natasha Zvereva #12 7-5 7-6 Betsy Nagelsen #67 Match data
Nov 12, 1987* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Natasha Zvereva #29 6-3 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Betsy Nagelsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1
17 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3
21 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6
25 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6
29 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6