H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Natasha Zvereva vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 1-2
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 2–1 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1991 Brighton fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1991* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-4 6-4 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Jul 2, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 7-6 4-6 6-4 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1988* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Natasha Zvereva | 6-4 0-6 6-2 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Natasha Zvereva | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |