H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Chris Evert H2H: 1-1

Natasha Zvereva and Chris Evert are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on carpet, while Chris Evert leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1988 Worcester semifinal 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 5, 1988* Worcester WTA 250 SF Carpet Natasha Zvereva #8 7-5 7-6 Chris Evert #3 Match data
Sep 7, 1987* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Chris Evert #3 6-0 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Chris Evert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11
17 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51
21 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85
25 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116
29 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122
30 — — — — — — — 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137
32 — — — — — — — 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142
33 — — — — — — — 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146
34 — — — — — — — 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146