H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 3-0

Natasha Zvereva holds a 3–0 lead over Claudia Kohde Kilsch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1992 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 27, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Natasha Zvereva #28 6-2 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #73 Match data
May 15, 1991* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Natasha Zvereva #17 6-1 6-2 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #47 Match data
Nov 13, 1987* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Natasha Zvereva #29 6-4 6-2 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #10 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Claudia Kohde Kilsch
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1
17 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9
21 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11
25 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12
29 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5 — — — — — — —