H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Natasha Zvereva vs Helena Sukova H2H: 2-2
Natasha Zvereva and Helena Sukova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1995 Zurich third round 3-6 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1995* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Helena Sukova | 3-6 7-6 6-4 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1990* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Natasha Zvereva | 6-3 6-4 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1988* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Natasha Zvereva | 6-2 6-3 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| May 31, 1987* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Helena Sukova | 6-1 6-3 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natasha Zvereva | Helena Sukova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 |