H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Isabelle Demongeot H2H: 2-0

Natasha Zvereva holds a 2–0 lead over Isabelle Demongeot in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1992 Canadian Open round of 64 6-3 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Isabelle Demongeot
FRA Age 59 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Natasha Zvereva #26 6-3 7-6 Isabelle Demongeot #86 Match data Aug 19, 1992* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Natasha Zvereva #18 6-1 6-1 Isabelle Demongeot #47 Match data Jan 12, 1990* R16 Sydney International Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,074 394 236 62.5% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Isabelle Demongeot #522 #35 69 1,841 119 157 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Isabelle Demongeot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,835 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 40–18 69.0% #7 1,997 0 0 1984 1–1 50.0% #165 1,513 0 0
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,804 0 0 1985 4–7 36.4% #135 1,520 0 0
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,953 0 2 1986 11–15 42.3% #65 1,608 0 0
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1987 17–20 45.9% #53 1,732 0 0
21 1992 34–20 63.0% #23 1,981 0 2 1988 19–19 50.0% #45 1,759 0 0
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,973 0 2 1989 18–15 54.5% #46 1,766 0 0
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,979 0 3 1990 15–17 46.9% #78 1,687 0 0
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,970 0 3 1991 13–14 48.1% #63 1,683 0 1
25 1996 13–13 50.0% #57 1,897 0 3 1992 7–17 29.2% #136 1,626 0 1
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,907 0 3 1993 5–11 31.2% #150 1,592 0 1
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,934 0 4 1994 3–9 25.0% #130 1,541 0 1
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 1995 5–9 35.7% #160 1,546 0 1
29 2000 11–13 45.8% #78 1,733 0 5 1996 1–3 25.0% #242 1,529 0 1
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,708 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Natasha Zvereva Isabelle Demongeot
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 16 10 26 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1984 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1989 12 6 18 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1990 15 3 18 83.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 1986 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
20 1991 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1987 7 8 15 46.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1988 5 8 13 38.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1993 15 6 21 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 10 8 18 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 3 11 14 21.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1997 15 10 25 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1998 15 10 25 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 157 98 255 61.6% 98 56 154 63.6% 71 31 102 69.6% 68 51 119 57.1% — 58 70 128 45.3% 30 43 73 41.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 12 21 33 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Natasha Zvereva Isabelle Demongeot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1575 112.4 — — — — +63 — — 56.3% -0.12 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 1836 140.5 — — — — -21 -249 -181 63.8% +0.70 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.1 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1997 161.2 — — — — -75 -213 -183 66.7% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 -3.11 1984 1514 102.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — +0.09
18 1989 1805 144.1 — — — — +20 -25 -21 57.3% +0.91 4–5 (44%) 2–7 (22%) 91.9 -0.26 1985 1520 106.0 — — — — — +7 +100 36.4% -0.95 — — — +0.76
19 1990 1953 156.8 — — — — -78 -41 -36 65.8% +1.03 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.3 -0.92 1986 1609 129.8 — — — — -40 -65 +53 45.8% -0.20 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 96.1 +0.38
20 1991 1912 148.8 — — — — -66 +41 +34 59.2% +0.55 6–3 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 106.2 -0.24 1987 1732 140.6 — — — — -56 -238 +22 45.2% -0.20 6–4 (60%) 0–1 — -0.92
21 1992 1982 158.3 — — — — -114 +58 +53 61.3% +0.90 6–5 (55%) 8–6 (57%) 102.4 -2.82 1988 1759 143.5 — — — — -71 -64 -55 53.9% +0.18 5–10 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 100.3 -3.79
22 1993 1974 157.3 — — — — -22 -9 +90 65.3% +0.98 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +0.50 1989 1766 145.5 — — — — -4 -36 -73 53.3% +0.31 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 101.0 -3.59
23 1994 1979 161.7 — — — — +7 -6 +1 69.6% +1.40 6–6 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 101.8 -1.08 1990 1688 134.0 — — — — +77 -6 — 43.5% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 103.7 -1.98
24 1995 1971 161.0 — — — — +27 -3 +16 59.5% +0.80 13–7 (65%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 -0.19 1991 1683 123.3 — — — — +67 -79 — 52.5% -0.12 2–5 (29%) 6–1 (86%) 98.5 +0.46
25 1996 1897 147.8 — — — — +45 +39 +91 50.0% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 -1.77 1992 1626 122.8 — — — — -19 -17 +52 32.7% -0.90 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 -1.74
26 1997 1907 154.8 — — — — +11 +5 +82 56.3% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -3.07 1993 1593 116.2 — — — — +3 -6 — 33.3% -1.23 4–3 (57%) 1–0 — -0.63
27 1998 1934 156.7 — — — — -36 -9 +187 60.5% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 99.6 -3.30 1994 1542 110.1 — — — — +37 +40 — 29.6% -1.11 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.9 +0.54
28 1999 1825 141.3 — — — — +2 0 +268 54.8% +0.40 8–3 (73%) 3–7 (30%) 99.9 -0.76 1995 1547 116.6 — — — — +52 -12 +36 38.7% -0.45 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.04
29 2000 1733 128.2 — — — — +39 +59 +392 42.0% -0.66 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -0.52 1996 1530 101.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.15
31 2002 1708 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2074 160.7 — — — — -23 -15 +55 60.5% +0.69 97–63 (61%) 77–61 (56%) 107.9 -2.55 — 1842 138.1 — — — — +1 -50 +21 44.7% -0.34 32–42 (43%) 24–19 (56%) 99.7 -3.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.