H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Natasha Zvereva vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 1-2
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 2–1 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 2–0 on carpet, while Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1993 Key Biscayne second round 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1993* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Natasha Zvereva | 7-6 7-6 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
| Feb 15, 1990* | Chicago | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 7-5 3-6 6-1 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1986* | Little Rock | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-4 6-7 6-0 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natasha Zvereva | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 15 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |