H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Kim Steinmetz H2H: 0-1

Kim Steinmetz holds a 1–0 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Steinmetz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Steinmetz won the 1988 US Open round of 128 4-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kim Steinmetz
USA Age 68

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Steinmetz #183 4-6 6-3 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #7 Match data Aug 31, 1988* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,074 394 236 62.5% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Kim Steinmetz #625 #99 6 1,649 48 78 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Kim Steinmetz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,835 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 40–18 69.0% #7 1,997 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,804 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,953 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0
21 1992 34–20 63.0% #23 1,981 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,973 0 2 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,593 0 0
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,979 0 3 1981 6–12 33.3% — 1,552 0 0
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,970 0 3 1982 12–12 50.0% — 1,626 0 0
25 1996 13–13 50.0% #57 1,897 0 3 1983 6–15 28.6% — 1,547 0 0
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,907 0 3 1984 6–8 42.9% #102 1,570 0 0
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,934 0 4 1985 0–7 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,467 0 0
29 2000 11–13 45.8% #78 1,733 0 5 1987 0–2 0.0% #215 1,447 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 1988 7–10 41.2% #133 1,506 0 0
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,708 0 5 1989 0–4 0.0% #478 1,470 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% #496 1,460 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Natasha Zvereva Kim Steinmetz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 16 10 26 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 12 6 18 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 15 3 18 83.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 15 6 21 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1980 — — — — 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
25 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1983 3 5 8 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
26 1997 15 10 25 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1984 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1998 15 10 25 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 157 98 255 61.6% 98 56 154 63.6% 71 31 102 69.6% 68 51 119 57.1% — 12 28 40 30.0% 19 20 39 48.7% 15 21 36 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Natasha Zvereva Kim Steinmetz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1575 112.4 — — — — +63 — — 56.3% -0.12 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 1836 140.5 — — — — -21 -249 -181 63.8% +0.70 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.1 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1997 161.2 — — — — -75 -213 -183 66.7% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 -3.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1805 144.1 — — — — +20 -25 -21 57.3% +0.91 4–5 (44%) 2–7 (22%) 91.9 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1953 156.8 — — — — -78 -41 -36 65.8% +1.03 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.3 -0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1912 148.8 — — — — -66 +41 +34 59.2% +0.55 6–3 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 106.2 -0.24 1978 1488 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.07
21 1992 1982 158.3 — — — — -114 +58 +53 61.3% +0.90 6–5 (55%) 8–6 (57%) 102.4 -2.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 1974 157.3 — — — — -22 -9 +90 65.3% +0.98 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +0.50 1980 1593 118.4 — — — — — +79 — 71.0% +1.64 1–0 2–2 (50%) — +2.46
23 1994 1979 161.7 — — — — +7 -6 +1 69.6% +1.40 6–6 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 101.8 -1.08 1981 1552 109.7 — — — — +36 +106 +7 35.1% -0.54 0–1 0–4 (0%) — +0.13
24 1995 1971 161.0 — — — — +27 -3 +16 59.5% +0.80 13–7 (65%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 -0.19 1982 1626 120.3 — — — — -98 +40 +17 49.2% -0.21 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.70
25 1996 1897 147.8 — — — — +45 +39 +91 50.0% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 -1.77 1983 1548 112.1 — — — — -19 +105 +39 34.8% -0.78 0–4 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.14
26 1997 1907 154.8 — — — — +11 +5 +82 56.3% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -3.07 1984 1571 110.2 — — — — -91 — +101 43.3% -0.40 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.44
27 1998 1934 156.7 — — — — -36 -9 +187 60.5% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 99.6 -3.30 1985 1478 88.9 — — — — -31 +49 — 12.5% -2.56 0–2 — — +0.89
28 1999 1825 141.3 — — — — +2 0 +268 54.8% +0.40 8–3 (73%) 3–7 (30%) 99.9 -0.76 1986 1468 91.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.13
29 2000 1733 128.2 — — — — +39 +59 +392 42.0% -0.66 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -0.52 1987 1448 100.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.14
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1507 108.7 — — — — -42 — +55 39.5% -0.60 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 103.2 +0.61
31 2002 1708 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15 1989 1471 98.2 — — — — -32 — — 20.0% -2.30 0–2 0–1 — -0.08
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1460 93.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.05
Career — 2074 160.7 — — — — -23 -15 +55 60.5% +0.69 97–63 (61%) 77–61 (56%) 107.9 -2.55 — 1650 113.2 — — — — -38 +74 +45 40.6% -0.55 12–19 (39%) 9–16 (36%) 93.3 +4.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.