H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Natasha Zvereva vs Laura Golarsa H2H: 3-0
Natasha Zvereva holds a 3–0 lead over Laura Golarsa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1992 Rome third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 1992* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Natasha Zvereva | 6-2 6-2 | Laura Golarsa | Match data |
| Jan 11, 1990* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Natasha Zvereva | 6-4 6-3 | Laura Golarsa | Match data |
| May 25, 1988* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Natasha Zvereva | 7-6(5) 6-0 | Laura Golarsa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Laura Golarsa | #693 | #39 | 436 | 1,761 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natasha Zvereva | Laura Golarsa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #79 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #58 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #61 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #213 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #112 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #149 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #168 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 |