H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 5-3

Natasha Zvereva holds a 5–3 lead over Leila Meskhi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Natasha Zvereva leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1993 Canadian Open round of 32 6-4 7-6.

BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 – 3
8 main-draw meetings
GEO Age 58 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leila Meskhi #31 6-4 7-6 Natasha Zvereva #24 Match data Aug 19, 1993* R32 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Natasha Zvereva #26 4-6 7-6 7-6 Leila Meskhi #22 Match data Nov 6, 1992* R16 Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Leila Meskhi #17 6-3 3-6 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #15 Match data Apr 6, 1991* SF Charleston Open WTA 1000 Clay
Leila Meskhi #21 6-4 6-0 Natasha Zvereva #12 Match data Aug 30, 1990* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Natasha Zvereva #14 6-2 6-1 Leila Meskhi #27 Match data Apr 6, 1990* R16 Charleston Open WTA 1000 Clay
Natasha Zvereva #9 6-3 6-2 Leila Meskhi #36 Match data Apr 8, 1989* QF Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Natasha Zvereva #8 6-2 6-0 Leila Meskhi #48 Match data Feb 18, 1989* QF Washington Open WTA 500 Hard
Natasha Zvereva #14 6-2 6-0 Leila Meskhi #42 Match data Mar 4, 1988* R16 San Antonio WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Natasha Zvereva — #5 1,820 2,074 393 236 62.5% 0 0 0 2 2 4
Leila Meskhi — #12 72 1,987 193 121 61.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Leila Meskhi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,836 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 40–18 69.0% #7 1,997 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,805 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,953 0 2 1987 11–7 61.1% #46 1,656 0 0
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1988 18–18 50.0% #46 1,696 0 0
21 1992 34–20 63.0% #23 1,981 0 2 1989 21–14 60.0% #30 1,795 0 1
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,973 0 2 1990 38–14 73.1% #19 1,928 0 3
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,979 0 3 1991 30–14 68.2% #15 1,937 0 4
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1992 26–16 61.9% #22 1,928 0 4
25 1996 13–13 50.0% #57 1,897 0 3 1993 22–17 56.4% #37 1,871 0 4
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,907 0 3 1994 22–15 59.5% #34 1,842 0 4
27 1998 34–21 61.8% #16 1,927 0 3 1995 5–2 71.4% #141 1,832 0 5
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,823 0 4 1996 0–4 0.0% #838 1,746 0 5
29 2000 11–13 45.8% #78 1,732 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,707 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Natasha Zvereva Leila Meskhi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 16 10 26 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 12 6 18 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 15 3 18 83.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 1987 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1991 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 15 12 27 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1989 15 7 22 68.2% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1993 15 6 21 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1990 19 5 24 79.2% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1992 9 6 15 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 1997 15 10 25 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1994 12 9 21 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1998 15 10 25 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1995 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 157 98 255 61.6% 98 56 154 63.6% 70 31 101 69.3% 68 51 119 57.1% — 101 58 159 63.5% 64 39 103 62.1% 3 8 11 27.3% 25 16 41 61.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Natasha Zvereva Leila Meskhi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1575 112.5 — — — — +64 — — 56.3% -0.12 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 1836 140.6 — — — — -22 -248 -181 63.8% +0.70 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.1 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1998 161.3 — — — — -75 -214 -184 66.7% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 -2.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1805 144.2 — — — — +20 -25 -21 57.3% +0.91 4–5 (44%) 2–7 (22%) 91.9 +1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1954 156.9 — — — — -79 -42 -37 65.8% +1.03 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.3 -0.92 1987 1656 134.5 — — — — +27 -63 — 64.1% +1.05 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.61
20 1991 1912 148.9 — — — — -65 +41 +34 59.2% +0.55 6–3 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 106.2 -0.24 1988 1697 129.8 — — — — +32 — -166 49.4% -0.23 8–5 (62%) 3–6 (33%) 102.3 +0.61
21 1992 1982 158.4 — — — — -114 +58 +52 61.3% +0.90 6–5 (55%) 8–6 (57%) 102.4 -2.82 1989 1795 139.4 — — — — +11 -135 — 59.2% +0.57 3–3 (50%) 8–0 (100%) 108.0 -1.09
22 1993 1974 157.3 — — — — -22 -9 +89 65.3% +0.98 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +0.50 1990 1928 151.0 — — — — +4 -112 -373 66.4% +1.63 10–3 (77%) 3–6 (33%) 102.3 +1.11
23 1994 1979 161.7 — — — — +7 -6 +1 69.6% +1.40 6–6 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 101.8 -1.08 1991 1937 151.4 — — — — -20 +20 — 62.6% +0.74 9–4 (69%) 5–5 (50%) 105.3 +0.25
24 1995 1971 161.0 — — — — +27 -3 +16 59.5% +0.80 13–7 (65%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 -0.19 1992 1928 157.9 — — — — -27 +60 — 61.5% +1.16 7–4 (64%) 3–8 (27%) 96.9 -1.71
25 1996 1898 147.8 — — — — +44 +38 +90 50.0% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 -1.77 1993 1872 148.4 — — — — -1 +91 — 55.3% +0.05 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.4 -1.93
26 1997 1908 154.8 — — — — +10 +4 +80 56.3% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -3.07 1994 1843 148.7 — — — — -3 +108 — 55.2% +0.72 9–4 (69%) 3–3 (50%) 102.8 +0.52
27 1998 1928 157.5 — — — — -30 -3 +182 60.3% +0.46 6–5 (55%) 4–4 (50%) 98.9 -2.91 1995 1833 120.0 — — — — +1 — — 73.3% +1.87 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +0.23
28 1999 1823 141.3 — — — — +4 +2 +266 54.8% +0.40 8–3 (73%) 3–7 (30%) 99.9 -0.71 1996 1747 89.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.63 — — — -0.21
29 2000 1733 128.2 — — — — +39 +59 +386 42.0% -0.66 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1708 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2074 160.8 — — — — -23 -14 +52 60.5% +0.69 96–63 (60%) 77–61 (56%) 107.8 -2.24 — 1987 152.8 — — — — +2 0 -270 58.9% +0.70 52–30 (63%) 28–33 (46%) 103.7 -0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.