H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 5-3

Natasha Zvereva holds a 5–3 lead over Leila Meskhi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Natasha Zvereva leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1993 Montreal third round 6-4 7-6.

BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
GEO Age 58 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 19, 1993* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Leila Meskhi #31 6-4 7-6 Natasha Zvereva #24 Match data
Nov 6, 1992* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Natasha Zvereva #26 4-6 7-6 7-6 Leila Meskhi #22 Match data
Apr 6, 1991* Hilton Head WTA 1000 SF Clay Leila Meskhi #17 6-3 3-6 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #15 Match data
Aug 30, 1990* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Leila Meskhi #21 6-4 6-0 Natasha Zvereva #12 Match data
Apr 6, 1990* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R16 Clay Natasha Zvereva #14 6-2 6-1 Leila Meskhi #27 Match data
Apr 8, 1989* Hilton Head WTA 250 QF Clay Natasha Zvereva #9 6-3 6-2 Leila Meskhi #36 Match data
Feb 13, 1989 Washington WTA 250 QF Hard Natasha Zvereva #8 6-2 6-0 Leila Meskhi #48 Match data
Mar 4, 1988* San Antonio WTA 250 R16 Hard Natasha Zvereva #14 6-2 6-0 Leila Meskhi #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Leila Meskhi #903 #12 72 2,001 192 119 61.7% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Leila Meskhi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0
17 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2 1987 11–7 61.1% #46 1,655 0 0
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1988 17–17 50.0% #46 1,688 0 0
21 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2 1989 21–14 60.0% #30 1,794 0 1
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2 1990 38–14 73.1% #19 1,928 0 3
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3 1991 30–14 68.2% #15 1,937 0 4
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1992 26–15 63.4% #22 1,939 0 4
25 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3 1993 22–17 56.4% #37 1,874 0 4
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3 1994 22–15 59.5% #34 1,843 0 4
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4 1995 5–2 71.4% #141 1,834 0 5
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 1996 0–4 0.0% #838 1,748 0 5
29 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5
31 2002 0–1 0.0% 1,733 0 5