H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Natasha Zvereva and Linda Wild are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Linda Wild leads 2–0 on grass, while Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1994 Eastbourne Open semifinal 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | 6-4 7-5 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data | Jun 18, 1994* | SF | Eastbourne Open | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Grass |
| Natasha Zvereva | 6-3 6-3 | Linda Wild | Match data | Feb 21, 1994 | R16 | Indian Wells Open | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Natasha Zvereva | 6-4 6-0 | Linda Wild | Match data | Nov 5, 1992* | R32 | Oakland | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Carpet |
| Linda Wild | 6-4 6-1 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data | Jun 28, 1991* | R64 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,074 | 394 | 236 | 62.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,815 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Natasha Zvereva | Linda Wild | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #7 | 1,997 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,953 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #23 | 1,981 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 |
| 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,973 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,979 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 |
| 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,970 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,625 | 0 | 5 |
| 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,897 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 |
| 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,540 | 0 | 5 |
| 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Natasha Zvereva | Linda Wild | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 1972 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1989 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 1990 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1989 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1991 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 1990 | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1992 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 1991 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1993 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% |
| 1992 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1994 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 1993 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 1995 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% |
| 1994 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 1996 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 1995 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1997 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1999 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 157 | 98 | 255 | 61.6% | 98 | 56 | 154 | 63.6% | 71 | 31 | 102 | 69.6% | 68 | 51 | 119 | 57.1% | Career | 70 | 79 | 149 | 47.0% | 19 | 30 | 49 | 38.8% | 19 | 19 | 38 | 50.0% | 27 | 18 | 45 | 60.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Natasha Zvereva | Linda Wild | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1986 | 1575 | 112.4 | — | — | — | — | +63 | — | — | 56.3% | -0.12 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–0 | — | +0.85 | 1972 | 1493 | 98.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 |
| 1987 | 1836 | 140.5 | — | — | — | — | -21 | -249 | -181 | 63.8% | +0.70 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–2 (67%) | 104.1 | +0.51 | 1989 | 1457 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 17.6% | -2.06 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.09 |
| 1988 | 1997 | 161.2 | — | — | — | — | -75 | -213 | -183 | 66.7% | +1.05 | 7–6 (54%) | 8–4 (67%) | 106.4 | -3.11 | 1990 | 1555 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -3 | — | 43.2% | -0.52 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.4 | -0.32 |
| 1989 | 1805 | 144.1 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -25 | -21 | 57.3% | +0.91 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–7 (22%) | 91.9 | -0.26 | 1991 | 1721 | 134.6 | — | — | — | — | -71 | -49 | -115 | 50.0% | -0.26 | 8–4 (67%) | 4–2 (67%) | 107.4 | -0.67 |
| 1990 | 1953 | 156.8 | — | — | — | — | -78 | -41 | -36 | 65.8% | +1.03 | 10–5 (67%) | 6–4 (60%) | 106.3 | -0.92 | 1992 | 1733 | 139.7 | — | — | — | — | -89 | -75 | +45 | 47.8% | -0.05 | 6–6 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 103.9 | -1.52 |
| 1991 | 1912 | 148.8 | — | — | — | — | -66 | +41 | +34 | 59.2% | +0.55 | 6–3 (67%) | 10–5 (67%) | 106.2 | -0.24 | 1993 | 1765 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -174 | -41 | 56.4% | +0.47 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–4 (43%) | 99.5 | +0.50 |
| 1992 | 1982 | 158.3 | — | — | — | — | -114 | +58 | +53 | 61.3% | +0.90 | 6–5 (55%) | 8–6 (57%) | 102.4 | -2.82 | 1994 | 1741 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | -38 | -164 | +80 | 51.6% | -0.05 | 8–9 (47%) | 6–4 (60%) | 98.6 | -1.90 |
| 1993 | 1974 | 157.3 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -9 | +90 | 65.3% | +0.98 | 7–3 (70%) | 8–4 (67%) | 104.2 | +0.50 | 1995 | 1758 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -201 | +14 | 58.0% | +0.57 | 3–6 (33%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.1 | +1.45 |
| 1994 | 1979 | 161.7 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -6 | +1 | 69.6% | +1.40 | 6–6 (50%) | 7–3 (70%) | 101.8 | -1.08 | 1996 | 1810 | 144.4 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -227 | -22 | 55.2% | +0.55 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–8 (43%) | 101.6 | +0.67 |
| 1995 | 1971 | 161.0 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -3 | +16 | 59.5% | +0.80 | 13–7 (65%) | 6–6 (50%) | 100.5 | -0.19 | 1997 | 1625 | 106.2 | — | — | — | — | +96 | -90 | +72 | 25.6% | -2.15 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.7 | +0.19 |
| 1996 | 1897 | 147.8 | — | — | — | — | +45 | +39 | +91 | 50.0% | -0.02 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 94.9 | -1.77 | 1999 | 1567 | 91.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.38 |
| 1997 | 1907 | 154.8 | — | — | — | — | +11 | +5 | +82 | 56.3% | +0.19 | 8–4 (67%) | 8–3 (73%) | 107.1 | -3.07 | 2000 | 1541 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.42 |
| 1998 | 1934 | 156.7 | — | — | — | — | -36 | -9 | +187 | 60.5% | +0.47 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.6 | -3.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 1825 | 141.3 | — | — | — | — | +2 | 0 | +268 | 54.8% | +0.40 | 8–3 (73%) | 3–7 (30%) | 99.9 | -0.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 1733 | 128.2 | — | — | — | — | +39 | +59 | +392 | 42.0% | -0.66 | 5–1 (83%) | 0–2 | — | -0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 1708 | 97.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2074 | 160.7 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -15 | +55 | 60.5% | +0.69 | 97–63 (61%) | 77–61 (56%) | 107.9 | -2.55 | Career | 1816 | 137.3 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -98 | +18 | 48.5% | -0.14 | 43–42 (51%) | 31–29 (52%) | 102.2 | -0.65 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steffi Graf | 1 | 20 | 21 | Mar 22, 1999 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 5 | 8 | 13 | Oct 16, 1993 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 7 | 5 | 12 | Feb 4, 2000 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 6 | 6 | 12 | Jun 20, 1999 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 4 | 8 | 12 | Oct 9, 1997 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Shriver | 3 | 2 | 5 | Nov 8, 1996 | H2H |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 1, 1996 | H2H |
| Rachel Mcquillan | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | 5 | 0 | 5 | Feb 17, 1994 | H2H |
| Nicole Bradtke | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 20, 1993 | H2H |