H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 4-1

Natasha Zvereva holds a 4–1 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1994 Zurich Open quarterfinal 7-6 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main-draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Natasha Zvereva #9 7-6 5-7 6-4 Lori Mcneil #18 Match data Oct 8, 1994* QF Zurich Open WTA 1000 Carpet
Natasha Zvereva #19 6-3 7-6 Lori Mcneil #25 Match data Feb 12, 1994* SF Chicago Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Natasha Zvereva #30 5-7 6-4 7-5 Lori Mcneil #22 Match data Jun 28, 1992* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Lori Mcneil #10 3-6 6-3 7-5 Natasha Zvereva #14 Match data Mar 5, 1988* QF San Antonio WTA 250 Hard
Natasha Zvereva #53 6-4 6-4 Lori Mcneil #11 Match data Jun 26, 1987* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Natasha Zvereva — #5 1,820 2,074 393 236 62.5% 0 0 0 2 2 4
Lori Mcneil — #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,836 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1988 40–18 69.0% #7 1,997 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,805 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,953 0 2 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1992 34–20 63.0% #23 1,981 0 2 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,973 0 2 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,979 0 3 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 1996 13–13 50.0% #57 1,897 0 3 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,907 0 3 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 1998 34–21 61.8% #16 1,927 0 3 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,823 0 4 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2000 11–13 45.8% #78 1,732 0 4 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,707 0 4 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,671 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Natasha Zvereva Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 16 10 26 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 12 6 18 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 15 3 18 83.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1991 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1993 15 6 21 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 1997 15 10 25 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1998 15 10 25 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 157 98 255 61.6% 98 56 154 63.6% 70 31 101 69.3% 68 51 119 57.1% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Natasha Zvereva Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1575 112.5 — — — — +64 — — 56.3% -0.12 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 1836 140.6 — — — — -22 -248 -181 63.8% +0.70 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.1 +0.28 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 1988 1998 161.3 — — — — -75 -214 -184 66.7% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 -2.80 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1989 1805 144.2 — — — — +20 -25 -21 57.3% +0.91 4–5 (44%) 2–7 (22%) 91.9 +1.24 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1990 1954 156.9 — — — — -79 -42 -37 65.8% +1.03 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.3 -0.92 1983 1569 107.2 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1991 1912 148.9 — — — — -65 +41 +34 59.2% +0.55 6–3 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 106.2 -0.24 1984 1609 115.3 — — — — +12 -55 +9 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32
21 1992 1982 158.4 — — — — -114 +58 +52 61.3% +0.90 6–5 (55%) 8–6 (57%) 102.4 -2.82 1985 1588 118.5 — — — — +21 -104 +4 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.23
22 1993 1974 157.3 — — — — -22 -9 +89 65.3% +0.98 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +0.50 1986 1885 145.0 — — — — -9 -342 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.25
23 1994 1979 161.7 — — — — +7 -6 +1 69.6% +1.40 6–6 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 101.8 -1.08 1987 2007 158.5 — — — — +54 -354 -204 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.70
24 1995 1971 161.0 — — — — +27 -3 +16 59.5% +0.80 13–7 (65%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 -0.19 1988 1902 142.7 — — — — +35 -186 +38 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +1.98
25 1996 1898 147.8 — — — — +44 +38 +90 50.0% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 -1.77 1989 1761 134.8 — — — — +59 -79 +78 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.28
26 1997 1908 154.8 — — — — +10 +4 +80 56.3% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -3.07 1990 1696 135.0 — — — — +13 -75 +199 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 1998 1928 157.5 — — — — -30 -3 +182 60.3% +0.46 6–5 (55%) 4–4 (50%) 98.9 -2.91 1991 1870 151.1 — — — — +12 -241 +44 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 1999 1823 141.3 — — — — +4 +2 +266 54.8% +0.40 8–3 (73%) 3–7 (30%) 99.9 -0.71 1992 1962 156.9 — — — — -4 -303 +75 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 2000 1733 128.2 — — — — +39 +59 +386 42.0% -0.66 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -0.52 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1872 146.0 — — — — -59 -207 +243 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 2002 1708 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +385 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +310 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 2074 160.8 — — — — -23 -14 +52 60.5% +0.69 96–63 (60%) 77–61 (56%) 107.8 -2.24 — 2025 149.3 — — — — +13 -213 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.