H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 4-1

Natasha Zvereva holds a 4–1 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1994 Zurich quarterfinal 7-6 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 8, 1994* Zurich WTA 1000 QF Carpet Natasha Zvereva #9 7-6 5-7 6-4 Lori Mcneil #18 Match data
Feb 12, 1994* Chicago WTA 250 SF Carpet Natasha Zvereva #19 6-3 7-6 Lori Mcneil #25 Match data
Jun 28, 1992* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Natasha Zvereva #30 5-7 6-4 7-5 Lori Mcneil #22 Match data
Mar 5, 1988* San Antonio WTA 250 QF Hard Lori Mcneil #10 3-6 6-3 7-5 Natasha Zvereva #14 Match data
Jun 26, 1987* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Natasha Zvereva #53 6-4 6-4 Lori Mcneil #11 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11