H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Natasha Zvereva vs María Emilia Salerni H2H: 0-1
María Emilia Salerni holds a 1–0 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, María Emilia Salerni leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, María Emilia Salerni won the 2000 Sydney Olympics second round 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2000* | Sydney Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | María Emilia Salerni | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,074 | 394 | 236 | 62.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| María Emilia Salerni | #328 | #65 | 471 | 1,556 | 31 | 61 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natasha Zvereva | María Emilia Salerni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #7 | 1,998 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,953 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #23 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #115 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,973 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #148 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,979 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,897 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #330 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |