H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Natasha Zvereva vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 2-2
Natasha Zvereva and Marianne Werdel Witmeyer are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1994 Filderstadt third round 2-6 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 1994* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 2-6 6-2 7-6 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Mar 4, 1993* | Delray Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Natasha Zvereva | 7-5 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1990* | Worcester | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Natasha Zvereva | 6-4 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1989* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-2 6-3 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Natasha Zvereva | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |