H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-4

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 4–0 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1995 Indian Wells final 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 5, 1995* Indian Wells WTA 1000 F Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #19 6-4 6-3 Natasha Zvereva #9 Match data
Oct 16, 1992* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-2 0-6 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #26 Match data
Aug 17, 1992 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #6 6-4 7-6 Natasha Zvereva #26 Match data
Mar 16, 1992* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-4 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5 — — — — — — —