H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Nana Smith H2H: 1-1

Natasha Zvereva and Nana Smith are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on grass, while Nana Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1998 Wimbledon second round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Natasha Zvereva #22 6-1 6-3 Nana Smith #99 Match data
Aug 21, 1989 Toronto WTA 250 R32 Hard Nana Smith #142 3-6 7-6 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Nana Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,586 0 0
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,540 0 0
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,529 0 0
21 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,558 0 0
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,445 0 0
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,545 0 0
25 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,602 0 0
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,537 0 0
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0
29 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5 — — — — — — —