H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 4-1

Natasha Zvereva holds a 4–1 lead over Naoko Sawamatsu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Naoko Sawamatsu leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1998 Indian Wells third round 6-4 6-3.

BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
JPN Age 53 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 8, 1998* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Natasha Zvereva #23 6-4 6-3 Naoko Sawamatsu #30 Match data
Aug 28, 1997* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Natasha Zvereva #27 6-4 3-6 6-3 Naoko Sawamatsu #44 Match data
Mar 21, 1995* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Natasha Zvereva #8 6-1 4-6 6-2 Naoko Sawamatsu #15 Match data
Feb 4, 1995* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Naoko Sawamatsu #17 1-6 6-3 6-3 Natasha Zvereva #7 Match data
Jun 20, 1990* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Natasha Zvereva #12 6-4 6-1 Naoko Sawamatsu #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Naoko Sawamatsu #266 #14 881 1,971 182 127 58.9% 0 0 0 3 1 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Naoko Sawamatsu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0 1989 0–2 0.0% #262 1,478 0 0
17 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0 1990 14–6 70.0% #31 1,669 0 1
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0 1991 21–16 56.8% #33 1,723 0 1
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2 1992 23–12 65.7% #24 1,865 0 1
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1993 24–13 64.9% #28 1,855 0 2
21 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2 1994 24–12 66.7% #26 1,872 0 3
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2 1995 22–13 62.9% #17 1,848 0 3
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3 1996 18–16 52.9% #38 1,807 0 3
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1997 24–19 55.8% #34 1,847 0 4
25 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3 1998 12–18 40.0% #55 1,720 0 4
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5
29 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5
31 2002 0–1 0.0% 1,733 0 5