H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 3-0

Natasha Zvereva holds a 3–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1992 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 24, 1992* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Natasha Zvereva #30 6-3 6-2 Nathalie Herreman #124 Match data
Jan 17, 1990* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Natasha Zvereva #18 6-7(3) 7-5 7-5 Nathalie Herreman #141 Match data
Oct 13, 1989* Moscow WTA 500 R16 Carpet Natasha Zvereva #14 6-1 6-3 Nathalie Herreman #131 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,728 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,548 0 0
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,564 0 0
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,543 0 0
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,718 0 1
21 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,641 0 1
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,606 0 1
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,684 0 1
25 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,619 0 1
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,622 0 1
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5 — — — — — — —