H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 4-1

Natasha Zvereva holds a 4–1 lead over Nicole Bradtke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Natasha Zvereva leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1996 Tokyo third round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 1, 1996* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Nicole Bradtke #34 6-2 6-3 Natasha Zvereva #15 Match data
May 20, 1995* German Open WTA 1000 QF Clay Natasha Zvereva #10 7-6 6-2 Nicole Bradtke #51 Match data
Feb 19, 1990 Washington WTA 250 QF Carpet Natasha Zvereva #13 5-7 6-3 6-4 Nicole Bradtke #72 Match data
Aug 19, 1988* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Natasha Zvereva #8 6-4 6-0 Nicole Bradtke #32 Match data
Jun 4, 1988* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Natasha Zvereva #15 6-3 6-7(3) 7-5 Nicole Bradtke #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,868 181 162 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Nicole Bradtke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0
17 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,600 0 0
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,738 0 0
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0
21 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,760 0 0
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2 1992 21–17 55.3% #47 1,714 0 1
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,757 0 2
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,705 0 2
25 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,786 0 3
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3 1996 6–10 37.5% #94 1,709 0 3
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,697 0 3
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5 — — — — — — —