H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 1-1

Natasha Zvereva and Raffaella Reggi Concato are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1992 Italian Open round of 16 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Raffaella Reggi Concato
ITA Age 60 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Natasha Zvereva #30 6-1 6-2 Raffaella Reggi Concato Match data May 8, 1992* R16 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Raffaella Reggi Concato 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #5 Match data May 31, 1989* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,074 394 236 62.5% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Raffaella Reggi Concato — — — 1,929 260 178 59.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Raffaella Reggi Concato
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1980 1–1 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 1981 0–5 0.0% — 1,421 0 0
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,835 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,413 0 0
17 1988 40–18 69.0% #7 1,997 0 0 1983 21–20 51.2% — 1,668 0 0
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,804 0 0 1984 17–14 54.8% — 1,753 0 0
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,953 0 2 1985 26–19 57.8% — 1,783 0 1
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1986 31–20 60.8% — 1,896 0 3
21 1992 34–20 63.0% #23 1,981 0 2 1987 39–21 65.0% — 1,903 0 4
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,973 0 2 1988 30–16 65.2% — 1,911 0 4
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,979 0 3 1989 39–22 63.9% — 1,855 0 4
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,970 0 3 1990 31–16 66.0% — 1,816 0 5
25 1996 13–13 50.0% #57 1,897 0 3 1991 11–11 50.0% — 1,707 0 5
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,907 0 3 1992 14–12 53.8% — 1,723 0 5
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,934 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 2000 11–13 45.8% #78 1,733 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,708 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Natasha Zvereva Raffaella Reggi Concato
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
15 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1988 16 10 26 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1989 12 6 18 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1990 15 3 18 83.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1991 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1986 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
21 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1987 11 5 16 68.8% 20 10 30 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 1993 15 6 21 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1988 11 6 17 64.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
23 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1989 20 11 31 64.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 5 11 54.5%
24 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1990 22 12 34 64.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
26 1997 15 10 25 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1998 15 10 25 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 157 98 255 61.6% 98 56 154 63.6% 71 31 102 69.6% 68 51 119 57.1% — 101 67 168 60.1% 102 57 159 64.2% 23 17 40 57.5% 34 34 68 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Natasha Zvereva Raffaella Reggi Concato
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13
15 1986 1575 112.4 — — — — +63 — — 56.3% -0.12 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — +0.85 1981 1421 91.5 — — — — — — — 23.1% -2.39 0–3 (0%) — — +0.25
16 1987 1836 140.5 — — — — -21 -249 -181 63.8% +0.70 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.1 +0.51 1982 1414 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02
17 1988 1997 161.2 — — — — -75 -213 -183 66.7% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 -3.11 1983 1668 126.0 — — — — +22 -51 -55 47.3% -0.21 9–2 (82%) 3–4 (43%) 109.6 -0.02
18 1989 1805 144.1 — — — — +20 -25 -21 57.3% +0.91 4–5 (44%) 2–7 (22%) 91.9 -0.26 1984 1753 129.4 — — — — -112 +30 -123 55.2% 0.00 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 103.3 -1.00
19 1990 1953 156.8 — — — — -78 -41 -36 65.8% +1.03 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.3 -0.92 1985 1783 138.4 — — — — -146 +128 — 54.2% +0.26 11–6 (65%) 4–5 (44%) 102.7 +0.03
20 1991 1912 148.8 — — — — -66 +41 +34 59.2% +0.55 6–3 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 106.2 -0.24 1986 1896 151.8 — — — — -61 +68 -239 57.6% +0.70 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 105.3 -1.91
21 1992 1982 158.3 — — — — -114 +58 +53 61.3% +0.90 6–5 (55%) 8–6 (57%) 102.4 -2.82 1987 1904 144.7 — — — — -19 +25 -206 62.5% +0.81 9–9 (50%) 5–0 (100%) 99.9 -0.62
22 1993 1974 157.3 — — — — -22 -9 +90 65.3% +0.98 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +0.50 1988 1912 144.0 — — — — +15 -21 -182 61.0% +0.50 9–4 (69%) 6–2 (75%) 106.8 -1.20
23 1994 1979 161.7 — — — — +7 -6 +1 69.6% +1.40 6–6 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 101.8 -1.08 1989 1856 141.4 — — — — -4 +23 -73 59.4% +0.69 12–8 (60%) 8–2 (80%) 107.5 +0.65
24 1995 1971 161.0 — — — — +27 -3 +16 59.5% +0.80 13–7 (65%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 -0.19 1990 1816 142.9 — — — — +36 +78 -27 61.5% +0.89 12–5 (71%) 4–5 (44%) 100.3 +0.44
25 1996 1897 147.8 — — — — +45 +39 +91 50.0% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 -1.77 1991 1707 117.7 — — — — +35 +164 — 49.0% -0.35 4–3 (57%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +1.53
26 1997 1907 154.8 — — — — +11 +5 +82 56.3% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -3.07 1992 1723 128.2 — — — — +7 +121 — 52.5% -0.02 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) 103.2 -0.10
27 1998 1934 156.7 — — — — -36 -9 +187 60.5% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 99.6 -3.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 1825 141.3 — — — — +2 0 +268 54.8% +0.40 8–3 (73%) 3–7 (30%) 99.9 -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1733 128.2 — — — — +39 +59 +392 42.0% -0.66 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1708 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2074 160.7 — — — — -23 -15 +55 60.5% +0.69 97–63 (61%) 77–61 (56%) 107.9 -2.55 — 1930 143.8 — — — — -14 +46 -117 56.4% +0.38 82–52 (61%) 47–22 (68%) 113.8 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.