H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Natasha Zvereva vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 1-1
Natasha Zvereva and Raffaella Reggi Concato are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1992 Rome fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1992* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Natasha Zvereva | 6-1 6-2 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
| May 31, 1989* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natasha Zvereva | Raffaella Reggi Concato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |