H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Natasha Zvereva vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 1-0
Natasha Zvereva holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Cacic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1995 Hilton Head fourth round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 1995* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Natasha Zvereva | 7-5 7-5 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natasha Zvereva | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |