H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 2-2

Natasha Zvereva and Sandra Cecchini are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 2–1 on clay, while Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1994 Hilton Head quarterfinal 5-7 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 2, 1994* Hilton Head WTA 1000 QF Clay Natasha Zvereva #12 5-7 6-3 6-0 Sandra Cecchini #58 Match data
Apr 5, 1991* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R16 Clay Natasha Zvereva #15 7-6 6-3 Sandra Cecchini #23 Match data
Nov 8, 1987* Little Rock WTA 250 F Hard Sandra Cecchini #19 0-6 6-1 6-3 Natasha Zvereva #32 Match data
May 7, 1987* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Sandra Cecchini #84 7-6 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #73 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11