H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Sara Gomer H2H: 0-1

Sara Gomer holds a 1–0 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1987 Key Biscayne round of 64 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sara Gomer
GBR Age 62 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sara Gomer #63 6-2 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #78 Match data Feb 25, 1987* R64 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,074 394 236 62.5% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Sara Gomer #317 #46 18 1,778 105 132 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Sara Gomer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,835 0 0 1980 2–1 66.7% — 1,518 0 0
17 1988 40–18 69.0% #7 1,997 0 0 1981 7–8 46.7% — 1,517 0 0
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,804 0 0 1982 6–4 60.0% — 1,545 0 0
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,953 0 2 1983 3–7 30.0% — 1,531 0 0
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1984 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0
21 1992 34–20 63.0% #23 1,981 0 2 1985 10–15 40.0% #101 1,568 0 0
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,973 0 2 1986 13–14 48.1% #59 1,660 0 0
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,979 0 3 1987 18–19 48.6% #72 1,680 0 0
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,970 0 3 1988 20–16 55.6% #51 1,747 0 1
25 1996 13–13 50.0% #57 1,897 0 3 1989 7–12 36.8% #124 1,638 0 1
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,907 0 3 1990 6–8 42.9% #92 1,635 0 1
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,934 0 4 1991 8–13 38.1% #120 1,660 0 1
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 1992 4–10 28.6% #173 1,556 0 1
29 2000 11–13 45.8% #78 1,733 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,708 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Natasha Zvereva Sara Gomer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 16 10 26 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1989 12 6 18 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1982 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 1990 15 3 18 83.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
20 1991 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1984 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1985 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1993 15 6 21 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1986 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 1 6 7 14.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 1997 15 10 25 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1998 15 10 25 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 1991 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 157 98 255 61.6% 98 56 154 63.6% 71 31 102 69.6% 68 51 119 57.1% — 47 57 104 45.2% 8 17 25 32.0% 32 39 71 45.1% 7 10 17 41.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Natasha Zvereva Sara Gomer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1575 112.4 — — — — +63 — — 56.3% -0.12 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 1836 140.5 — — — — -21 -249 -181 63.8% +0.70 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.1 +0.51 1980 1519 104.5 — — — — — — — 66.7% +0.83 — — — +0.03
17 1988 1997 161.2 — — — — -75 -213 -183 66.7% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 -3.11 1981 1517 109.2 — — — — — — — 45.5% -0.09 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.6 +0.09
18 1989 1805 144.1 — — — — +20 -25 -21 57.3% +0.91 4–5 (44%) 2–7 (22%) 91.9 -0.26 1982 1545 105.7 — — — — — -19 — 60.0% +0.55 — 2–0 — +1.20
19 1990 1953 156.8 — — — — -78 -41 -36 65.8% +1.03 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.3 -0.92 1983 1532 102.6 — — — — +81 — +22 40.0% -0.92 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.8 +0.59
20 1991 1912 148.8 — — — — -66 +41 +34 59.2% +0.55 6–3 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 106.2 -0.24 1984 1511 108.2 — — — — — — +34 26.7% -1.60 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.16
21 1992 1982 158.3 — — — — -114 +58 +53 61.3% +0.90 6–5 (55%) 8–6 (57%) 102.4 -2.82 1985 1568 117.6 — — — — -18 — +24 42.9% -0.46 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 98.6 +1.64
22 1993 1974 157.3 — — — — -22 -9 +90 65.3% +0.98 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +0.50 1986 1660 119.5 — — — — -6 -213 -39 46.9% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.7 +0.62
23 1994 1979 161.7 — — — — +7 -6 +1 69.6% +1.40 6–6 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 101.8 -1.08 1987 1680 131.9 — — — — -13 — -6 46.3% -0.39 6–2 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 105.2 -0.33
24 1995 1971 161.0 — — — — +27 -3 +16 59.5% +0.80 13–7 (65%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 -0.19 1988 1747 138.3 — — — — -19 — -34 53.7% +0.15 6–4 (60%) 9–4 (69%) 108.3 -0.39
25 1996 1897 147.8 — — — — +45 +39 +91 50.0% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 -1.77 1989 1639 114.0 — — — — -23 -117 +78 43.5% -0.78 2–6 (25%) 1–0 — -0.51
26 1997 1907 154.8 — — — — +11 +5 +82 56.3% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -3.07 1990 1636 113.1 — — — — -36 — +106 42.4% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.82
27 1998 1934 156.7 — — — — -36 -9 +187 60.5% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 99.6 -3.30 1991 1661 134.5 — — — — -33 — +111 40.4% -0.55 2–3 (40%) 0–3 (0%) 97.6 -1.11
28 1999 1825 141.3 — — — — +2 0 +268 54.8% +0.40 8–3 (73%) 3–7 (30%) 99.9 -0.76 1992 1557 104.1 — — — — +24 -82 — 34.4% -1.06 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 94.9 +1.43
29 2000 1733 128.2 — — — — +39 +59 +392 42.0% -0.66 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1708 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2074 160.7 — — — — -23 -15 +55 60.5% +0.69 97–63 (61%) 77–61 (56%) 107.9 -2.55 — 1779 127.6 — — — — -13 -99 +25 45.3% -0.39 32–35 (48%) 31–30 (51%) 102.3 +1.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.