H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Steffi Graf H2H: 1-20

Steffi Graf holds a 20–1 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 21 main-draw meetings, Steffi Graf leads 8–0 on hard courts and 6–0 on clay. Most recently, Steffi Graf won the 1999 Key Biscayne round of 16 6-2 6-4.

BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 20
21 main-draw meetings
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Steffi Graf #7 6-2 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #19 Match data Mar 22, 1999* R16 Key Biscayne Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Steffi Graf #57 6-1 6-3 Natasha Zvereva #15 Match data Aug 1, 1998* QF Stanford Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Natasha Zvereva #22 6-4 7-5 Steffi Graf #75 Match data Jun 28, 1998* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Steffi Graf #45 6-3 6-0 Natasha Zvereva #23 Match data Mar 5, 1998 QF Indian Wells Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Steffi Graf #1 6-4 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #27 Match data Sep 1, 1996* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Steffi Graf #1 6-4 6-3 Natasha Zvereva #15 Match data Nov 13, 1995 SF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Steffi Graf #2 6-4 7-6 Natasha Zvereva #8 Match data Mar 22, 1995* QF Key Biscayne Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Steffi Graf #1 4-6 6-1 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #14 Match data Mar 17, 1994* F Key Biscayne Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Steffi Graf #1 6-2 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #19 Match data Nov 15, 1993 R16 WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Steffi Graf #1 6-2 6-1 Natasha Zvereva #23 Match data Oct 2, 1993* QF Leipzig Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Steffi Graf #2 6-2 6-0 Natasha Zvereva #22 Match data Feb 6, 1993* R16 Tokyo Pan Pacific Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Steffi Graf #2 6-3 6-1 Natasha Zvereva #30 Match data Jul 3, 1992* QF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Steffi Graf #2 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 Natasha Zvereva #28 Match data Jun 4, 1992* QF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Steffi Graf #2 6-0 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #16 Match data Apr 13, 1991* QF Amelia Island Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Steffi Graf #1 6-0 6-1 Natasha Zvereva #13 Match data Nov 10, 1990* QF Worcester Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Steffi Graf #1 6-0 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #12 Match data Aug 4, 1990* QF Canadian Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Steffi Graf #1 6-4 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #13 Match data May 19, 1990* SF Berlin Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Steffi Graf #1 7-6 6-7 6-1 Natasha Zvereva #18 Match data Apr 14, 1990* SF Amelia Island Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Steffi Graf #1 6-1 6-1 Natasha Zvereva #9 Match data Apr 9, 1989* F Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay
Steffi Graf #1 6-3 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #8 Match data Feb 13, 1989 SF Washington Open WTA 250 Hard
Steffi Graf #1 6-0 6-0 Natasha Zvereva #15 Match data Jun 5, 1988* F Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,074 394 236 62.5% 0 0 0 0 2 3 5
Steffi Graf #3 #1 5,028 2,603 876 110 88.8% 22 1 15 5 32 32 107

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Steffi Graf
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 1981 1–1 50.0% 1,502 0 0
13 1982 2–4 33.3% 1,507 0 0
14 1983 6–7 46.2% 1,545 0 0
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 1984 17–13 56.7% #22 1,748 0 0
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,835 0 0 1985 40–13 75.5% #6 2,038 0 0
17 1988 40–18 69.0% #7 1,997 0 0 1986 63–6 91.3% #3 2,322 0 8
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,804 0 0 1987 70–2 97.2% #1 2,505 1 19
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,953 0 2 1988 73–3 96.1% #1 2,539 5 30
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1989 85–2 97.7% #1 2,588 8 44
21 1992 34–20 63.0% #23 1,981 0 2 1990 72–5 93.5% #1 2,512 9 54
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,973 0 2 1991 64–8 88.9% #2 2,420 10 61
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,979 0 3 1992 66–7 90.4% #2 2,434 11 69
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,970 0 3 1993 77–5 93.9% #1 2,506 14 79
25 1996 13–13 50.0% #57 1,897 0 3 1994 58–6 90.6% #1 2,414 15 86
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,907 0 3 1995 48–2 96.0% #1 2,464 18 95
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,934 0 4 1996 51–4 92.7% #1 2,475 21 102
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 1997 16–4 80.0% #28 2,400 21 103
29 2000 11–13 45.8% #78 1,733 0 5 1998 33–9 78.6% #9 2,305 21 106
30 1999 34–9 79.1% #3 2,242 22 107
31 2002 0–1 0.0% 1,708 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Natasha Zvereva Steffi Graf
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
12 1981 1 1 2 50.0%
13 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
14 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1985 19 6 25 76.0% 14 4 18 77.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
17 1988 16 10 26 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1986 20 3 23 87.0% 24 1 25 96.0% 19 2 21 90.5%
18 1989 12 6 18 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1987 23 1 24 95.8% 32 0 32 100.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 9 0 9 100.0%
19 1990 15 3 18 83.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 1988 39 1 40 97.5% 20 1 21 95.2% 7 0 7 100.0% 7 1 8 87.5%
20 1991 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1989 39 0 39 100.0% 25 2 27 92.6% 7 0 7 100.0% 14 0 14 100.0%
21 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1990 23 1 24 95.8% 20 2 22 90.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0%
22 1993 15 6 21 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1991 22 4 26 84.6% 19 2 21 90.5% 7 0 7 100.0% 16 2 18 88.9%
23 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1992 13 2 15 86.7% 25 3 28 89.3% 7 0 7 100.0% 21 2 23 91.3%
24 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 33 2 35 94.3% 21 1 22 95.5% 7 0 7 100.0% 16 2 18 88.9%
25 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 38 2 40 95.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
26 1997 15 10 25 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1995 22 1 23 95.7% 11 0 11 100.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 8 1 9 88.9%
27 1998 15 10 25 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 1996 21 1 22 95.5% 14 1 15 93.3% 7 0 7 100.0% 9 2 11 81.8%
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 3 1 4 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
29 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 14 5 19 73.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 13 2 15 86.7%
30 1999 15 5 20 75.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
31 2002 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 157 98 255 61.6% 98 56 154 63.6% 71 31 102 69.6% 68 51 119 57.1% 350 39 389 90.0% 267 32 299 89.3% 84 14 98 85.7% 175 25 200 87.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Natasha Zvereva Steffi Graf
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
12 1981 1502 99.4 60.0% 0.00 0–1 +0.64
13 1982 1507 121.5 +26 38.5% -0.62 0–1 +0.12
14 1983 1546 109.1 +59 +52 +29 48.1% -0.15 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) +1.35
15 1986 1575 112.4 +63 56.3% -0.12 3–1 (75%) 2–0 +0.85 1984 1748 139.6 -68 -81 -28 51.4% +0.26 9–3 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 111.2 -0.41
16 1987 1836 140.5 -21 -249 -181 63.8% +0.70 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.1 +0.51 1985 2038 163.0 -73 -131 -289 69.6% +1.45 9–4 (69%) 10–3 (77%) 110.8 -2.74
17 1988 1997 161.2 -75 -213 -183 66.7% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 -3.11 1986 2322 176.8 -62 -128 80.5% +2.45 17–3 (85%) 6–7 (46%) 110.7 -5.94
18 1989 1805 144.1 +20 -25 -21 57.3% +0.91 4–5 (44%) 2–7 (22%) 91.9 -0.26 1987 2505 181.5 -48 -84 -637 90.8% +3.42 9–0 (100%) 3–3 (50%) 107.5 -4.82
19 1990 1953 156.8 -78 -41 -36 65.8% +1.03 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.3 -0.92 1988 2540 181.5 -7 -92 -528 91.8% +3.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 102.5 -1.98
20 1991 1912 148.8 -66 +41 +34 59.2% +0.55 6–3 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 106.2 -0.24 1989 2588 183.5 +30 -140 -492 93.4% +3.80 7–2 (78%) 2–2 (50%) 102.4 -1.81
21 1992 1982 158.3 -114 +58 +53 61.3% +0.90 6–5 (55%) 8–6 (57%) 102.4 -2.82 1990 2512 178.9 +89 -52 -324 89.0% +3.13 8–1 (89%) 5–6 (45%) 98.6 -0.44
22 1993 1974 157.3 -22 -9 +90 65.3% +0.98 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +0.50 1991 2420 177.1 +72 +83 -183 86.8% +3.10 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 92.3 -0.99
23 1994 1979 161.7 +7 -6 +1 69.6% +1.40 6–6 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 101.8 -1.08 1992 2435 179.0 +24 +66 -41 82.0% +2.69 16–5 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 99.7 -1.85
24 1995 1971 161.0 +27 -3 +16 59.5% +0.80 13–7 (65%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 -0.19 1993 2506 183.0 -28 +45 -107 86.5% +2.91 13–3 (81%) 8–2 (80%) 107.4 -3.07
25 1996 1897 147.8 +45 +39 +91 50.0% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 -1.77 1994 2415 179.9 +25 +40 86.0% +3.10 7–3 (70%) 3–7 (30%) 93.7 -1.05
26 1997 1907 154.8 +11 +5 +82 56.3% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -3.07 1995 2465 178.3 +6 +52 -61 87.4% +2.78 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 102.0 -1.58
27 1998 1934 156.7 -36 -9 +187 60.5% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 99.6 -3.30 1996 2475 176.2 -6 +55 +63 89.5% +2.71 6–1 (86%) 8–2 (80%) 104.0 -1.13
28 1999 1825 141.3 +2 0 +268 54.8% +0.40 8–3 (73%) 3–7 (30%) 99.9 -0.76 1997 2400 149.1 +38 +70 75.0% +1.65 4–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) 0.00
29 2000 1733 128.2 +39 +59 +392 42.0% -0.66 5–1 (83%) 0–2 -0.52 1998 2305 172.9 +58 +169 74.5% +2.06 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 98.2 -1.13
30 1999 2243 171.2 -5 +219 +171 70.7% +1.82 13–4 (76%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 -2.55
31 2002 1708 97.4 33.3% -1.67 0–1 +0.15
Career 2074 160.7 -23 -15 +55 60.5% +0.69 97–63 (61%) 77–61 (56%) 107.9 -2.55 2604 181.8 +8 -20 -151 83.0% +2.71 147–45 (77%) 78–58 (57%) 106.9 -3.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.