H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Tara Snyder H2H: 4-0

Natasha Zvereva holds a 4–0 lead over Tara Snyder in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1999 Eastbourne Open round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Tara Snyder
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Natasha Zvereva #17 6-3 6-3 Tara Snyder #47 Match data Jun 17, 1999* R32 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Natasha Zvereva #18 6-7 6-2 6-4 Tara Snyder #36 Match data Feb 4, 1999* R32 Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Natasha Zvereva #16 6-2 6-1 Tara Snyder #35 Match data Nov 12, 1998* R32 Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Natasha Zvereva #15 6-2 6-4 Tara Snyder #50 Match data Jul 30, 1998* R32 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,074 394 236 62.5% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Tara Snyder #779 #33 769 1,717 45 67 40.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Tara Snyder
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,835 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 40–18 69.0% #7 1,997 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,804 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #204 1,484 0 0
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,953 0 2 1996 0–1 0.0% #262 1,474 0 0
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1997 1–2 33.3% #120 1,487 0 0
21 1992 34–20 63.0% #23 1,981 0 2 1998 20–14 58.8% #34 1,709 0 1
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,973 0 2 1999 11–20 35.5% #74 1,664 0 1
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,979 0 3 2000 8–13 38.1% #129 1,628 0 1
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,970 0 3 2001 1–4 20.0% #190 1,579 0 1
25 1996 13–13 50.0% #57 1,897 0 3 2002 1–2 33.3% #170 1,565 0 1
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,907 0 3 2003 3–4 42.9% #108 1,577 0 1
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,934 0 4 2004 0–6 0.0% #247 1,497 0 1
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 2000 11–13 45.8% #78 1,733 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,708 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Natasha Zvereva Tara Snyder
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 16 10 26 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 12 6 18 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 15 3 18 83.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1998 6 7 13 46.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
22 1993 15 6 21 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 2000 6 7 13 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2001 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1997 15 10 25 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2003 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 1998 15 10 25 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2004 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 157 98 255 61.6% 98 56 154 63.6% 71 31 102 69.6% 68 51 119 57.1% — 24 39 63 38.1% 11 14 25 44.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 5 5 10 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Natasha Zvereva Tara Snyder
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1575 112.4 — — — — +63 — — 56.3% -0.12 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 1836 140.5 — — — — -21 -249 -181 63.8% +0.70 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.1 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1997 161.2 — — — — -75 -213 -183 66.7% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 -3.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1805 144.1 — — — — +20 -25 -21 57.3% +0.91 4–5 (44%) 2–7 (22%) 91.9 -0.26 1995 1484 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.12
19 1990 1953 156.8 — — — — -78 -41 -36 65.8% +1.03 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.3 -0.92 1996 1475 102.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.03
20 1991 1912 148.8 — — — — -66 +41 +34 59.2% +0.55 6–3 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 106.2 -0.24 1997 1488 121.1 — — — — +38 — — 33.3% -0.83 — 1–0 — -0.02
21 1992 1982 158.3 — — — — -114 +58 +53 61.3% +0.90 6–5 (55%) 8–6 (57%) 102.4 -2.82 1998 1709 130.7 — — — — -53 -51 -84 54.1% +0.35 6–2 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 108.3 +0.74
22 1993 1974 157.3 — — — — -22 -9 +90 65.3% +0.98 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +0.50 1999 1664 126.1 — — — — -15 -37 -78 35.2% -1.13 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 106.4 -1.84
23 1994 1979 161.7 — — — — +7 -6 +1 69.6% +1.40 6–6 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 101.8 -1.08 2000 1629 120.4 — — — — +4 -13 — 39.1% -0.87 2–6 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 96.8 -1.19
24 1995 1971 161.0 — — — — +27 -3 +16 59.5% +0.80 13–7 (65%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 -0.19 2001 1580 102.7 — — — — -2 — — 25.0% -0.92 1–1 0–1 — -0.09
25 1996 1897 147.8 — — — — +45 +39 +91 50.0% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 -1.77 2002 1566 100.0 — — — — -3 — — 37.5% -1.38 1–1 0–1 — +0.07
26 1997 1907 154.8 — — — — +11 +5 +82 56.3% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -3.07 2003 1577 107.7 — — — — -12 — — 38.5% -0.62 0–1 1–0 — -0.22
27 1998 1934 156.7 — — — — -36 -9 +187 60.5% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 99.6 -3.30 2004 1497 94.8 -0.71 -0.07 0.714 41.9% +11 — — 0.0% -3.40 — — — 0.00
28 1999 1825 141.3 — — — — +2 0 +268 54.8% +0.40 8–3 (73%) 3–7 (30%) 99.9 -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1733 128.2 — — — — +39 +59 +392 42.0% -0.66 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1708 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2074 160.7 — — — — -23 -15 +55 60.5% +0.69 97–63 (61%) 77–61 (56%) 107.9 -2.55 — 1718 126.4 -0.71 -0.07 0.714 41.9% -16 -36 -82 39.3% -0.70 16–14 (53%) 10–8 (56%) 106.2 -2.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.