H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 5-0

Natasha Zvereva holds a 5–0 lead over Wiltrud Probst in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1997 Australian Open second round 7-6(5) 6-3.

BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 17, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Natasha Zvereva #56 7-6(5) 6-3 Wiltrud Probst #118 Match data
Oct 7, 1993* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Natasha Zvereva #22 6-0 6-3 Wiltrud Probst #78 Match data
Oct 23, 1992* Brighton WTA 250 R32 Carpet Natasha Zvereva #27 7-5 6-3 Wiltrud Probst #42 Match data
Aug 28, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Natasha Zvereva #21 6-1 7-6(5) Wiltrud Probst #86 Match data
May 16, 1991* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Natasha Zvereva #17 7-5 7-5 Wiltrud Probst #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Wiltrud Probst #794 #31 344 1,757 119 161 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Wiltrud Probst
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0
17 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0 1986 4–5 44.4% #135 1,510 0 0
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0 1987 9–14 39.1% #99 1,570 0 0
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2 1988 13–17 43.3% #80 1,622 0 0
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1989 11–13 45.8% #90 1,651 0 0
21 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2 1990 19–14 57.6% #40 1,707 0 1
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2 1991 9–18 33.3% #126 1,581 0 1
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3 1992 16–13 55.2% #40 1,707 0 2
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1993 10–18 35.7% #105 1,611 0 2
25 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3 1994 11–14 44.0% #69 1,630 0 2
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3 1995 7–11 38.9% #146 1,616 0 2
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4 1996 1–6 14.3% #113 1,574 0 2
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 1997 7–9 43.8% #84 1,620 0 2
29 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5 1998 2–9 18.2% #194 1,569 0 2
31 2002 0–1 0.0% 1,733 0 5