H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nathalie Dechy vs Adriana Rikl Gersi H2H: 1-2
Adriana Rikl Gersi holds a 2–1 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Adriana Rikl Gersi leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 2001 Bratislava third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2001* | Bratislava | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nathalie Dechy | 6-2 6-3 | Adriana Rikl Gersi | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2000 | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Adriana Rikl Gersi | 7-6 (ret.) | Nathalie Dechy | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Adriana Rikl Gersi | 4-6 6-0 6-2 | Nathalie Dechy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Adriana Rikl Gersi | #898 | #48 | 551 | 1,646 | 54 | 90 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nathalie Dechy | Adriana Rikl Gersi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #99 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #92 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #63 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #77 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #68 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #73 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #348 | 1,486 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |