H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nathalie Dechy vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 1-2

Amanda Coetzer holds a 2–1 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 2003 Rome third round 2-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Dechy
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 15, 2003* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Nathalie Dechy #24 2-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) Amanda Coetzer #17 Match data
Sep 13, 2002* Bahia WTA 500 R16 Hard Amanda Coetzer #27 6-2 3-6 6-3 Nathalie Dechy #25 Match data
Aug 14, 1997* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R32 Hard Amanda Coetzer #6 4-6 6-4 6-2 Nathalie Dechy #115 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,917 291 270 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Dechy Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,501 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0
18 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,539 0 0 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,619 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0
20 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,790 0 0 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0
21 2000 28–19 59.6% #26 1,777 0 0 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2
22 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,626 0 0 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3
23 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3
24 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,819 0 1 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3
25 2004 33–23 58.9% #21 1,810 0 1 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5
26 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,798 0 1 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,649 0 1 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6
28 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7
29 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,582 0 1 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9