H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Nathalie Dechy vs Amy Frazier H2H: 3-5

Amy Frazier holds a 5–3 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 5–0 on hard courts, while Nathalie Dechy leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2005 Quebec City semifinal 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Dechy
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 5
8 main draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 5, 2005* Quebec City WTA 500 SF Hard Amy Frazier #70 6-4 7-5 Nathalie Dechy #13 Match data
Jun 17, 2005* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Nathalie Dechy #18 4-6 6-3 6-3 Amy Frazier #31 Match data
Aug 28, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Amy Frazier #42 (w/o) Nathalie Dechy #24 Match data
Aug 4, 2000* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #26 6-3 3-6 6-1 Nathalie Dechy #21 Match data
Mar 24, 2000* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #21 6-3 7-5 Nathalie Dechy #23 Match data
Feb 26, 2000* Oklahoma WTA 500 QF Carpet Nathalie Dechy #26 6-4 7-5 Amy Frazier #22 Match data
Jun 17, 1999* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Nathalie Dechy #29 4-6 6-2 6-1 Amy Frazier #27 Match data
Jan 16, 1999* Hobart WTA 250 QF Hard Amy Frazier #41 6-3 6-1 Nathalie Dechy #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,917 291 270 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Dechy Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0
16 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1
17 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,501 0 0 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2
18 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,539 0 0 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2
19 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,619 0 0 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3
20 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,790 0 0 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3
21 2000 28–19 59.6% #26 1,777 0 0 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,626 0 0 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5
23 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5
24 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,819 0 1 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5
25 2004 33–23 58.9% #21 1,810 0 1 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,798 0 1 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6
27 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,649 0 1 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,582 0 1 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8