H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Dechy vs Angelica Gavaldon H2H: 1-0

Nathalie Dechy holds a 1–0 lead over Angelica Gavaldon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 1996 Surabaya round of 32 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Dechy
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Angelica Gavaldon
MEX Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Dechy #99 7-6 6-4 Angelica Gavaldon #217 Match data Oct 10, 1996* R32 Surabaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,918 293 272 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Angelica Gavaldon #434 #34 237 1,735 75 111 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Dechy Angelica Gavaldon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #264 1,499 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1989 2–4 33.3% #191 1,501 0 0
16 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0 1990 16–16 50.0% #51 1,601 0 0
17 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,500 0 0 1991 1–6 14.3% #242 1,556 0 0
18 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,540 0 0 1992 5–10 33.3% #142 1,577 0 0
19 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,606 0 0 1993 19–20 48.7% #64 1,613 0 0
20 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,788 0 0 1994 9–16 36.0% #119 1,605 0 0
21 2000 30–20 60.0% #26 1,792 0 0 1995 17–17 50.0% #36 1,677 0 0
22 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,629 0 0 1996 3–11 21.4% #219 1,593 0 0
23 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0 1997 1–5 16.7% #107 1,527 0 0
24 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,840 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #697 1,521 0 0
25 2004 33–24 57.9% #21 1,809 0 1 1999 0–1 0.0% #379 1,515 0 0
26 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,797 0 1 2000 1–1 50.0% #261 1,526 0 0
27 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,648 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Dechy Angelica Gavaldon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1995 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 13 10 23 56.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
17 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 12 11 23 52.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1999 12 11 23 52.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2001 10 13 23 43.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2002 18 12 30 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2003 13 7 20 65.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 28 17 45 62.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 8 15 23 34.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 8 10 18 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 160 145 305 52.5% 71 66 137 51.8% 34 33 67 50.7% 28 28 56 50.0% — 55 71 126 43.7% 13 21 34 38.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 10 12 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Dechy Angelica Gavaldon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1500 105.9 — — — — +36 — — 33.3% -1.44 0–1 0–1 — +0.09
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1501 104.0 — — — — +24 — — 35.7% -1.14 1–1 1–0 — +0.22
16 1995 1481 98.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.03 1990 1601 123.4 — — — — +41 -70 -31 48.0% -0.39 7–4 (64%) 2–2 (50%) 105.8 +1.11
17 1996 1501 112.9 — — — — +19 +53 — 38.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.56 1991 1557 107.9 — — — — +21 — — 23.5% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.31
18 1997 1540 124.8 — — — — -7 +9 — 42.9% -0.29 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — -0.35 1992 1578 119.9 — — — — -6 -9 — 29.0% -1.29 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.47
19 1998 1607 125.9 — — — — -40 -52 +18 42.2% -0.42 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 95.8 +0.60 1993 1613 127.0 — — — — +4 -19 -41 49.4% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 99.4 +0.85
20 1999 1788 147.7 — — — — -63 -117 -80 55.1% +0.41 11–6 (65%) 6–4 (60%) 108.9 -1.15 1994 1605 119.4 — — — — +7 -4 — 35.3% -0.88 3–0 (100%) 1–6 (14%) 100.2 -0.02
21 2000 1792 145.6 — — — — -2 -103 -48 58.7% +0.61 9–6 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 101.9 -1.62 1995 1678 132.9 — — — — 0 -76 -137 48.6% -0.23 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.9 +0.35
22 2001 1629 124.7 — — — — +13 +69 +76 48.6% -0.06 7–12 (37%) 5–5 (50%) 93.7 -0.20 1996 1593 116.6 — — — — +13 — — 25.8% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 96.1 -0.12
23 2002 1770 144.3 — — — — -37 +23 -68 56.2% +0.35 14–11 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 105.9 -0.89 1997 1528 94.3 — — — — +25 +52 — 28.6% -1.79 0–2 — — +0.66
24 2003 1840 138.9 +1.35 +3.00 1.221 54.2% -60 +48 -96 58.5% +0.48 12–2 (86%) 2–3 (40%) 108.2 -0.85 1998 1522 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.13
25 2004 1810 147.7 +1.35 +0.63 1.034 51.1% +6 +3 -86 57.9% +0.62 7–9 (44%) 6–8 (43%) 95.0 -1.40 1999 1515 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.20
26 2005 1798 146.1 +1.56 +0.35 1.048 51.3% +22 -36 -11 56.8% +0.55 12–6 (67%) 9–10 (47%) 98.9 +1.39 2000 1526 104.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — +0.09
27 2006 1648 128.2 +0.04 -1.40 0.952 49.0% -1 +72 +148 42.7% -0.42 7–9 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 92.6 +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 1651 130.6 -1.46 -0.89 0.907 47.9% -3 +66 +97 45.6% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–8 (33%) 95.8 -1.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1671 130.8 -1.57 -0.33 0.919 48.2% +12 -28 +59 45.5% -0.24 4–4 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 -1.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1581 108.4 -1.61 -3.48 0.839 46.8% +48 +1 +106 32.4% -1.11 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 96.4 -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1919 143.2 -0.42 -0.73 0.953 49.1% -9 0 -6 51.4% +0.13 98–90 (52%) 60–67 (47%) 96.4 -1.34 — 1735 127.2 — — — — +13 -28 -69 41.0% -0.69 25–21 (54%) 14–21 (40%) 101.4 +1.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.