H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Nathalie Dechy vs Anne Kremer H2H: 0-2

Anne Kremer holds a 2–0 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2002 Eastbourne third round 6-4 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Dechy
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 2002* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Anne Kremer #23 6-4 2-6 6-4 Nathalie Dechy #27 Match data
May 16, 2001* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anne Kremer #30 4-6 6-0 6-0 Nathalie Dechy #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,917 291 270 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Dechy Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,619 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,790 0 0 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0
21 2000 28–19 59.6% #26 1,777 0 0 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0
22 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,626 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0
23 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0
24 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,819 0 1 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2
25 2004 33–23 58.9% #21 1,810 0 1 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,798 0 1 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2
27 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,649 0 1 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2
28 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2
29 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2
30 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,582 0 1 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2