H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nathalie Dechy vs Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario H2H: 4-0
Nathalie Dechy holds a 4–0 lead over Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Dechy leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 2002 Berlin fourth round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2002* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Nathalie Dechy | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Match data |
| Apr 11, 2002* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Nathalie Dechy | 6-2 6-2 | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2001* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Nathalie Dechy | 7-6(9) 3-6 6-2 | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1999* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Nathalie Dechy | 7-5 6-2 | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | #52 | #1 | 3,768 | 2,385 | 708 | 267 | 72.6% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 29 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Dechy | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #18 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,068 | 1 | 3 |
| 18 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,081 | 1 | 5 |
| 19 | 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,166 | 1 | 6 |
| 20 | 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 59–15 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,288 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 |
| 22 | 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 |
| 23 | 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,156 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,106 | 3 | 24 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,022 | 3 | 24 |
| 26 | 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,039 | 4 | 26 |
| 27 | 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 |
| 28 | 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #8 | 1,930 | 4 | 27 |
| 29 | 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 4 | 29 |
| 30 | 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 |