H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nathalie Dechy vs Barbara Schett H2H: 1-2
Barbara Schett holds a 2–1 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 2003 Gold Coast quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2003* | Gold Coast | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Nathalie Dechy | 6-4 6-2 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2001* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Barbara Schett | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Nathalie Dechy | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Barbara Schett | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Nathalie Dechy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Dechy | Barbara Schett | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |